37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 699082 |
Time | |
Date | 200605 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | B737-300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : maintenance |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
ASRS Report | 699082 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : improper maintenance maintenance problem : improper documentation non adherence : published procedure non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other other : 1 |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure performance deficiency : inspection performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft Chart Or Publication Environmental Factor |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
On may/xa/06; I left for field service with one other mechanic to change the #2 engine driven fuel pump and mec (main engine control) on air carrier X. Prior to departure; the supervisor on duty upgraded me up to an inspector by completing same form. One time rii upgrade form; after this was accomplished; the supervisor was informed that an additional mechanic was required for this road trip since one would now be an inspector and the other one mechanic would be left to complete the task of changing the engine driven fuel pump and mec alone. The supervisor's reply was essentially that he was not going to send 3 people on a road trip due to this. I assisted the change of the mec and fuel pump with the other mechanic. This is not an uncommon practice to the extent that I didn't realize I was not supposed to sign off the inspection; even though I assisted as a mechanic and upgrade inspector.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A B737-300 HAD AN ENG DRIVEN FUEL PUMP AND MAIN ENG CTL REPLACED OFF LINE. UPGRADED TECHNICIAN SIGNED FOR REQUIRED INSPECTION.
Narrative: ON MAY/XA/06; I LEFT FOR FIELD SVC WITH ONE OTHER MECH TO CHANGE THE #2 ENG DRIVEN FUEL PUMP AND MEC (MAIN ENG CTL) ON ACR X. PRIOR TO DEP; THE SUPVR ON DUTY UPGRADED ME UP TO AN INSPECTOR BY COMPLETING SAME FORM. ONE TIME RII UPGRADE FORM; AFTER THIS WAS ACCOMPLISHED; THE SUPVR WAS INFORMED THAT AN ADDITIONAL MECH WAS REQUIRED FOR THIS ROAD TRIP SINCE ONE WOULD NOW BE AN INSPECTOR AND THE OTHER ONE MECH WOULD BE LEFT TO COMPLETE THE TASK OF CHANGING THE ENG DRIVEN FUEL PUMP AND MEC ALONE. THE SUPVR'S REPLY WAS ESSENTIALLY THAT HE WAS NOT GOING TO SEND 3 PEOPLE ON A ROAD TRIP DUE TO THIS. I ASSISTED THE CHANGE OF THE MEC AND FUEL PUMP WITH THE OTHER MECH. THIS IS NOT AN UNCOMMON PRACTICE TO THE EXTENT THAT I DIDN'T REALIZE I WAS NOT SUPPOSED TO SIGN OFF THE INSPECTION; EVEN THOUGH I ASSISTED AS A MECH AND UPGRADE INSPECTOR.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.