37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 707389 |
Time | |
Date | 200608 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : clt.airport |
State Reference | NC |
Altitude | agl single value : 400 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : clt.tower |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | climbout : initial |
Route In Use | departure sid : pan6 |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time total : 12000 flight time type : 3000 |
ASRS Report | 707389 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Company Airspace Structure Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
I guess it really started when our company changed commercial chart suppliers. More on this later. We diverted to clt with a pressurization problem. 5 hours later our maintenance control through contract maintenance started to sign off our logbook. We started our APU only to see a message 'low oil' which allows 10 hour of use. Our maintenance told contract maintenance to MEL the entire APU! We thought that we would get runway 36L for departure. The first officer set up our FMS and dialed in a 330 degree heading for runway 36L. After pushback we had to do an extra QRH procedure to 'xbleed' our second engine due to an APU out! Now with our attention diverted from normal; we were given runway 36R! We continued our taxi to runway 36R. Now to the charts; unlike previous supplier; 'all' the departures are on 1 chart. I had the pictorial open to make sure of our route. One has to really look hard to make sure of the correct departure! On takeoff at 400 ft we started to turn to 330 degrees. Within 5 degrees the tower caught it and told us to turn to 025 degrees. We switched to departure and told to call the tower on landing. We explained what happened and they said no problem! The rtes and headings are only on a text page! Our company switched to save money! At no time did we get any alerts for conflicting traffic. A good corrective action would be to go back to previous supplier; which most pilots have been using for 20+ yrs!
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A FLT CREW DEPARTING CLT TURNS WRONG WAY ON DEP FROM RWY 36R.
Narrative: I GUESS IT REALLY STARTED WHEN OUR COMPANY CHANGED COMMERCIAL CHART SUPPLIERS. MORE ON THIS LATER. WE DIVERTED TO CLT WITH A PRESSURIZATION PROB. 5 HRS LATER OUR MAINT CTL THROUGH CONTRACT MAINT STARTED TO SIGN OFF OUR LOGBOOK. WE STARTED OUR APU ONLY TO SEE A MESSAGE 'LOW OIL' WHICH ALLOWS 10 HR OF USE. OUR MAINT TOLD CONTRACT MAINT TO MEL THE ENTIRE APU! WE THOUGHT THAT WE WOULD GET RWY 36L FOR DEP. THE FO SET UP OUR FMS AND DIALED IN A 330 DEG HDG FOR RWY 36L. AFTER PUSHBACK WE HAD TO DO AN EXTRA QRH PROC TO 'XBLEED' OUR SECOND ENG DUE TO AN APU OUT! NOW WITH OUR ATTN DIVERTED FROM NORMAL; WE WERE GIVEN RWY 36R! WE CONTINUED OUR TAXI TO RWY 36R. NOW TO THE CHARTS; UNLIKE PREVIOUS SUPPLIER; 'ALL' THE DEPS ARE ON 1 CHART. I HAD THE PICTORIAL OPEN TO MAKE SURE OF OUR RTE. ONE HAS TO REALLY LOOK HARD TO MAKE SURE OF THE CORRECT DEP! ON TKOF AT 400 FT WE STARTED TO TURN TO 330 DEGS. WITHIN 5 DEGS THE TWR CAUGHT IT AND TOLD US TO TURN TO 025 DEGS. WE SWITCHED TO DEP AND TOLD TO CALL THE TWR ON LNDG. WE EXPLAINED WHAT HAPPENED AND THEY SAID NO PROB! THE RTES AND HDGS ARE ONLY ON A TEXT PAGE! OUR COMPANY SWITCHED TO SAVE MONEY! AT NO TIME DID WE GET ANY ALERTS FOR CONFLICTING TFC. A GOOD CORRECTIVE ACTION WOULD BE TO GO BACK TO PREVIOUS SUPPLIER; WHICH MOST PLTS HAVE BEEN USING FOR 20+ YRS!
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.