37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 708049 |
Time | |
Date | 200608 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001 To 0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zzz.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A319 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Qualification | technician : airframe technician : powerplant |
Experience | maintenance technician : 38 |
ASRS Report | 708049 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | maintenance : technician |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical maintenance problem : non compliance with mel non adherence : far non adherence : published procedure |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : ecam warning other flight crewa other flight crewb |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | other |
Factors | |
Maintenance | contributing factor : schedule pressure contributing factor : manuals performance deficiency : non compliance with legal requirements performance deficiency : logbook entry |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Maintenance Human Performance Aircraft Chart Or Publication |
Primary Problem | Maintenance Human Performance |
Narrative:
The inbound air carrier X experienced a slat problem channel #2. Our radio electronics technician requested my assistance in deferring problem per MEL. We pulled up MEL and both agreed that our problem matched MEL 27-XXX and performed test as prescribed; which resulted in pulling and collaring circuit breaker. On arrival of flight at ZZZ1; crew experienced channel 2 flaps (circuit breaker out). Item changed to MEL 27-xxy. We felt we used correct MEL and test was satisfactory. I have since reviewed MEL and determined that in fact we did use wrong MEL. I feel that stress might have been determining factor as both the radio electronics technician and myself had been working outbound aircraft which were having unusual problems; and we were shorthanded and working against the clock.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN A319 WAS DISPATCHED WITH A SLAT PROB DEFERRED PER THE MEL. IMPROPER MEL REF USED IN DEFERRAL.
Narrative: THE INBOUND ACR X EXPERIENCED A SLAT PROB CHANNEL #2. OUR RADIO ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN REQUESTED MY ASSISTANCE IN DEFERRING PROB PER MEL. WE PULLED UP MEL AND BOTH AGREED THAT OUR PROB MATCHED MEL 27-XXX AND PERFORMED TEST AS PRESCRIBED; WHICH RESULTED IN PULLING AND COLLARING CIRCUIT BREAKER. ON ARR OF FLT AT ZZZ1; CREW EXPERIENCED CHANNEL 2 FLAPS (CIRCUIT BREAKER OUT). ITEM CHANGED TO MEL 27-XXY. WE FELT WE USED CORRECT MEL AND TEST WAS SATISFACTORY. I HAVE SINCE REVIEWED MEL AND DETERMINED THAT IN FACT WE DID USE WRONG MEL. I FEEL THAT STRESS MIGHT HAVE BEEN DETERMINING FACTOR AS BOTH THE RADIO ELECTRONICS TECHNICIAN AND MYSELF HAD BEEN WORKING OUTBOUND ACFT WHICH WERE HAVING UNUSUAL PROBS; AND WE WERE SHORTHANDED AND WORKING AGAINST THE CLOCK.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.