37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 725658 |
Time | |
Date | 200702 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | navaid : pxv.vortac |
State Reference | IN |
Altitude | msl single value : 36000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zid.artcc |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 700 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other Other |
Flight Phase | cruise : level |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : instrument pilot : commercial pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 7800 flight time type : 300 |
ASRS Report | 725658 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance non adherence : published procedure other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued advisory flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance Aircraft Chart Or Publication |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
While en route we received a WX update for dfw. We changed our landing runway in our FMS to reflect the current operations at dfw. While updating our landing runway; we inadvertently entered the fsm VOR transition to the BONHAM5 arrival to dfw; as opposed to our original clearance which was the lit VOR transition to the BONHAM5 arrival to dfw. Approximately 10 miles past pxv VOR; ATC advised that we were north of course and issued a heading to fly to get back on our flight plan route. Once we resolved the confusion with ATC over which transition we were to fly; we revised our routing in our FMS; intercepted the course and proceeded on our flight plan route with no further incident. After review of this incident; I realized that we often fly the fsm VOR transition to this arrival to dfw; so the mistake was easily overlooked. To prevent this in the future; I think it would be a good practice to reconfirm the entire flight plan route any time a change is made in the FMS; as to the current practice of verifying just the perceived changes.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MISPROGRAMMING OF ARR TRANSITION TO DFW RESULTS IN TRACK DEV FOR CARJ.
Narrative: WHILE ENRTE WE RECEIVED A WX UPDATE FOR DFW. WE CHANGED OUR LNDG RWY IN OUR FMS TO REFLECT THE CURRENT OPERATIONS AT DFW. WHILE UPDATING OUR LNDG RWY; WE INADVERTENTLY ENTERED THE FSM VOR TRANSITION TO THE BONHAM5 ARR TO DFW; AS OPPOSED TO OUR ORIGINAL CLRNC WHICH WAS THE LIT VOR TRANSITION TO THE BONHAM5 ARR TO DFW. APPROX 10 MILES PAST PXV VOR; ATC ADVISED THAT WE WERE NORTH OF COURSE AND ISSUED A HDG TO FLY TO GET BACK ON OUR FLT PLAN RTE. ONCE WE RESOLVED THE CONFUSION WITH ATC OVER WHICH TRANSITION WE WERE TO FLY; WE REVISED OUR ROUTING IN OUR FMS; INTERCEPTED THE COURSE AND PROCEEDED ON OUR FLT PLAN RTE WITH NO FURTHER INCIDENT. AFTER REVIEW OF THIS INCIDENT; I REALIZED THAT WE OFTEN FLY THE FSM VOR TRANSITION TO THIS ARR TO DFW; SO THE MISTAKE WAS EASILY OVERLOOKED. TO PREVENT THIS IN THE FUTURE; I THINK IT WOULD BE A GOOD PRACTICE TO RECONFIRM THE ENTIRE FLT PLAN RTE ANY TIME A CHANGE IS MADE IN THE FMS; AS TO THE CURRENT PRACTICE OF VERIFYING JUST THE PERCEIVED CHANGES.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.