Narrative:

Phl had a runway/approach change from ILS runway 9R to ILS runway 27R. They inadvertently switched the ILS to runway 9L. We were the first aircraft on the switched approach. As we were vectored to ILS runway 27R we observed the correct ILS frequency (runway 27R and runway 9L are the same frequency); but eventually noticed reverse localizer sensing and wrong ILS identification. We executed a go around. We were then vectored for another approach; which was now correct -- runway 27R and an uneventful approach and landing. No explanation; comments; or apologizes from ATC. My flight was running 5 plus hours late; so fatigue was also a factor.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AFTER CHANGING ACTIVE RWYS FROM RWY 9R TO RWY 27R; PHL TWR CHANGED THE ILS FREQ FROM RWY 9R TO RWY 9L; CAUSING REVERSE SENSING AND AN A330 TO GO AROUND.

Narrative: PHL HAD A RWY/APCH CHANGE FROM ILS RWY 9R TO ILS RWY 27R. THEY INADVERTENTLY SWITCHED THE ILS TO RWY 9L. WE WERE THE FIRST ACFT ON THE SWITCHED APCH. AS WE WERE VECTORED TO ILS RWY 27R WE OBSERVED THE CORRECT ILS FREQ (RWY 27R AND RWY 9L ARE THE SAME FREQ); BUT EVENTUALLY NOTICED REVERSE LOC SENSING AND WRONG ILS ID. WE EXECUTED A GAR. WE WERE THEN VECTORED FOR ANOTHER APCH; WHICH WAS NOW CORRECT -- RWY 27R AND AN UNEVENTFUL APCH AND LNDG. NO EXPLANATION; COMMENTS; OR APOLOGIZES FROM ATC. MY FLT WAS RUNNING 5 PLUS HOURS LATE; SO FATIGUE WAS ALSO A FACTOR.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.