37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 755521 |
Time | |
Date | 200709 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | msl single value : 1500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tower : zzz.tower |
Operator | general aviation : corporate |
Make Model Name | Citation X |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : corporate |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : multi engine pilot : commercial pilot : atp pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 11000 flight time type : 2000 |
ASRS Report | 755521 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government : faa |
Function | controller : local |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : published procedure non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued alert flight crew : returned to intended or assigned course |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
I was the PNF and had just gotten ATIS at ZZZ. It was VFR and they were landing xx and xy; we discussed the location of the FBO on the field and said that it would be a shorter taxi on xy. After we looked at the airport diagram and loaded the GPS approach as a backup to the visual; we continued with approach to the field. We got a base leg turn and then we were cleared for the visual xy; however we never got it that xy was the farthest west runway and looked at xz all the way to the airport. When we got handed off to tower he said it looked like we were lined up for xz; after a delay while we looked up what he was saying; we acknowledged he was right and said we would need to go around. He said slow to approach speed and he worked us into xz where takeoffs were lined up; and we landed uneventfully without any unsafe conditions. In my 20 yrs of airline and corporate flying I have not ever done that; reminding me even if the other guy is visual; the need to back up the approach is a must.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A CORPORATE PILOT REPORTS LANDING PREPARATIONS FOR THE INCORRECT RWY AFTER FAILURE TO CHECK AVAILABLE ARPT INFORMATION AND CHARTS.
Narrative: I WAS THE PNF AND HAD JUST GOTTEN ATIS AT ZZZ. IT WAS VFR AND THEY WERE LNDG XX AND XY; WE DISCUSSED THE LOCATION OF THE FBO ON THE FIELD AND SAID THAT IT WOULD BE A SHORTER TAXI ON XY. AFTER WE LOOKED AT THE ARPT DIAGRAM AND LOADED THE GPS APCH AS A BACKUP TO THE VISUAL; WE CONTINUED WITH APCH TO THE FIELD. WE GOT A BASE LEG TURN AND THEN WE WERE CLRED FOR THE VISUAL XY; HOWEVER WE NEVER GOT IT THAT XY WAS THE FARTHEST W RWY AND LOOKED AT XZ ALL THE WAY TO THE ARPT. WHEN WE GOT HANDED OFF TO TWR HE SAID IT LOOKED LIKE WE WERE LINED UP FOR XZ; AFTER A DELAY WHILE WE LOOKED UP WHAT HE WAS SAYING; WE ACKNOWLEDGED HE WAS RIGHT AND SAID WE WOULD NEED TO GO AROUND. HE SAID SLOW TO APCH SPD AND HE WORKED US INTO XZ WHERE TKOFS WERE LINED UP; AND WE LANDED UNEVENTFULLY WITHOUT ANY UNSAFE CONDITIONS. IN MY 20 YRS OF AIRLINE AND CORPORATE FLYING I HAVE NOT EVER DONE THAT; REMINDING ME EVEN IF THE OTHER GUY IS VISUAL; THE NEED TO BACK UP THE APCH IS A MUST.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.