37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 766948 |
Time | |
Date | 200712 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801 To 2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | agl single value : 3000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : zzz.tracon |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Navigation In Use | other |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 120 flight time total : 10000 flight time type : 6000 |
ASRS Report | 766948 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : critical |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : overcame equipment problem |
Consequence | other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
Flight control problem led to a zero flap landing. I'm really not sure if we did anything wrong. The airplane just came out of heavy maintenance and this was the first revenue flight; so it was knowingly delayed while cabin crew inspected aircraft for discrepancies. There was a sense of urgency; but I informed crew; maintenance control; dispatch and everyone else I could; to take their time and get it all right. Trying to use CRM to address issues. Maybe I should have officially declared an emergency? We did inform controller of flight control failure. Uneventful landing. Maintenance eventually fixed flap lock; and flew back to ZZZ uneventfully.callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information: reporter stated when he positioned the flap handle from one degree setting to level two; the slats extended; although not fully; and no flap movement. He saw an ECAM message that the flaps had 'locked' and they remained that way all the way to the gate. His flight was the first revenue flight after maintenance overhaul when he encountered the zero flaps issue.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: AN AIRBUS A320 PLT RPTS OF HAVING TO PERFORM ZERO FLAPS LNDG AFTER FIRST REVENUE FLT OF ACFT OUT OF OVERHAUL.
Narrative: FLT CTL PROB LED TO A ZERO FLAP LNDG. I'M REALLY NOT SURE IF WE DID ANYTHING WRONG. THE AIRPLANE JUST CAME OUT OF HEAVY MAINT AND THIS WAS THE FIRST REVENUE FLT; SO IT WAS KNOWINGLY DELAYED WHILE CABIN CREW INSPECTED ACFT FOR DISCREPANCIES. THERE WAS A SENSE OF URGENCY; BUT I INFORMED CREW; MAINT CTL; DISPATCH AND EVERYONE ELSE I COULD; TO TAKE THEIR TIME AND GET IT ALL RIGHT. TRYING TO USE CRM TO ADDRESS ISSUES. MAYBE I SHOULD HAVE OFFICIALLY DECLARED AN EMER? WE DID INFORM CTLR OF FLT CTL FAILURE. UNEVENTFUL LNDG. MAINT EVENTUALLY FIXED FLAP LOCK; AND FLEW BACK TO ZZZ UNEVENTFULLY.CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO: RPTR STATED WHEN HE POSITIONED THE FLAP HANDLE FROM ONE DEG SETTING TO LEVEL TWO; THE SLATS EXTENDED; ALTHOUGH NOT FULLY; AND NO FLAP MOVEMENT. HE SAW AN ECAM MESSAGE THAT THE FLAPS HAD 'LOCKED' AND THEY REMAINED THAT WAY ALL THE WAY TO THE GATE. HIS FLT WAS THE FIRST REVENUE FLT AFTER MAINT OVERHAUL WHEN HE ENCOUNTERED THE ZERO FLAPS ISSUE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of January 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.