37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 803805 |
Time | |
Date | 200809 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : mco.airport |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | agl single value : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | A319 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | ground : takeoff roll |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 22000 flight time type : 6300 |
ASRS Report | 803805 |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | aircraft : equipment problem dissipated |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Aircraft Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Narrative:
During the initial takeoff roll; we received an erroneous EFIS alert for low fuel temperature in the #2 main fuel tank. Since the tank temperature showed -55 degree C (-67 degree F) and the outside air temperature was above 80 degrees F; it was obvious that the indication was incorrect; so we continued the takeoff. Within 1 min after liftoff; the temperature indication returned to normal. The A319 is designed to inhibit all but a number of alerts during takeoff once the thrust has been set. Prior to that; alerts are displayed on the ECAM and a chime is sounded. For true malfunctions; the benefit is obvious. However; erroneous indications can create temporary distraction and confusion during a critical phase of flight. Fortunately for us; it was daylight VFR with no traffic considerations and a long runway available. Had the WX been low IFR with a lot of traffic on the taxiway or traffic on short final; the potential existed for an unnecessary abort or go around. Computerized aircraft system can occasionally generate faulty information requiring the crew to analyzesituation correctly. During certain phases of flight; this can be difficult and pose a reduction in the margin of safety if the information is not correctly interpreted.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A319 CAPTAIN REPORTS DISTRACTION FROM FALSE FUEL TANK TEMPERATURE ECAM WARNING DURING TKOF ROLL.
Narrative: DURING THE INITIAL TKOF ROLL; WE RECEIVED AN ERRONEOUS EFIS ALERT FOR LOW FUEL TEMP IN THE #2 MAIN FUEL TANK. SINCE THE TANK TEMP SHOWED -55 DEG C (-67 DEG F) AND THE OUTSIDE AIR TEMP WAS ABOVE 80 DEGS F; IT WAS OBVIOUS THAT THE INDICATION WAS INCORRECT; SO WE CONTINUED THE TKOF. WITHIN 1 MIN AFTER LIFTOFF; THE TEMP INDICATION RETURNED TO NORMAL. THE A319 IS DESIGNED TO INHIBIT ALL BUT A NUMBER OF ALERTS DURING TKOF ONCE THE THRUST HAS BEEN SET. PRIOR TO THAT; ALERTS ARE DISPLAYED ON THE ECAM AND A CHIME IS SOUNDED. FOR TRUE MALFUNCTIONS; THE BENEFIT IS OBVIOUS. HOWEVER; ERRONEOUS INDICATIONS CAN CREATE TEMPORARY DISTRACTION AND CONFUSION DURING A CRITICAL PHASE OF FLT. FORTUNATELY FOR US; IT WAS DAYLIGHT VFR WITH NO TFC CONSIDERATIONS AND A LONG RWY AVAILABLE. HAD THE WX BEEN LOW IFR WITH A LOT OF TFC ON THE TXWY OR TFC ON SHORT FINAL; THE POTENTIAL EXISTED FOR AN UNNECESSARY ABORT OR GAR. COMPUTERIZED ACFT SYS CAN OCCASIONALLY GENERATE FAULTY INFO REQUIRING THE CREW TO ANALYZESITUATION CORRECTLY. DURING CERTAIN PHASES OF FLT; THIS CAN BE DIFFICULT AND POSE A REDUCTION IN THE MARGIN OF SAFETY IF THE INFO IS NOT CORRECTLY INTERPED.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.