37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 813416 |
Time | |
Date | 200811 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : zzz.airport |
State Reference | US |
Altitude | msl single value : 4000 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Dusk |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : zzz.tracon |
Operator | general aviation : personal |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Route In Use | approach : visual |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | other |
Function | flight crew : single pilot |
Qualification | pilot : private pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 13 flight time total : 849 flight time type : 738 |
ASRS Report | 813416 |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | aircraft equipment other aircraft equipment : fuel guage other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance other |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Supplementary | |
Problem Areas | Weather Aircraft ATC Human Performance Flight Crew Human Performance |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
I departed for ZZZ. Ete was XA30 and I had 5 hours fuel. Most of the flight was in IFR conditions with strong headwinds which I anticipated in my 1 1/2 hour fuel reserve. Based upon estimated fuel burn; I thought I had sufficient fuel to complete the flight as filed. However; upon reaching ZZZ; my fuel gauges indicated close to empty. I was vectored and sequenced for the ILS approach to runway X. This was time and fuel consuming and I became worried that I might not have enough fuel to complete the ILS approach and landing. ZZZ was in VFR conditions and I could see the airport and runway. I notified approach of my minimal fuel status; that I might not be able to tolerate any significant delay and requested expedited handling with a visual approach. I was asked to estimate fuel remaining in mins which I did at 20 mins (by fuel gauges). I was cleared for landing on runway Y and then runway X. I landed without any further delay or incident. After landing; I was told to call TRACON; which I did. I spoke with a controller who was very upset and angry. He proceeded to scold and reprimand me at length. He told me (among other things) that: 1) I should have landed elsewhere earlier; 2) I jeopardized the lives of my family (on-board); 3) I disregarded the IFR 45 min reserve fuel requirement. 4) I inconvenienced many other aircraft. He threatened to sanction or violate me. I apologized repeatedly and told him that this was the first and only time this had ever happened to me. By the end of our conversation; he said he would not file any papers against me. After refueling; it turned out that I had 7 gallons fuel at the time of touchdown. I am; indeed; very sorry about this incident. However; in my defense I would like to point out: 1) it was not easy or risk free to land earlier because of WX. 2) when I passed the last candidate airport for earlier landing; my calculations and fuel gauges both suggested that I had sufficient fuel remaining to complete the flight to ZZZ safely. 3) I did not disregard or violate the IFR reserve fuel requirement. I started this flight with a fuel reserve of 1.5 hours and ended it with a reserve of 7 gallons (at least 45 mins). 4) the fuel gauges indications were very worrisome. I think I did the right thing by asking ATC for help. However; judging by the verbal beating that I sustained afterward; it would appear that ATC would prefer a crash rather than a call for help.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C172 PILOT PLANS AND FLIES 3 1/2 HOUR IFR FLIGHT WITH 5 HOURS FUEL ONBOARD. FLIGHT TAKES 3 3/4 HOURS AND REPORTER DECLARES LOW FUEL APPROACHING DESTINATION DUE TO FUEL GAUGE READINGS. REPORTER IS BERATED OVER THE PHONE BY CONTROLLER AFTER LANDING.
Narrative: I DEPARTED FOR ZZZ. ETE WAS XA30 AND I HAD 5 HRS FUEL. MOST OF THE FLT WAS IN IFR CONDITIONS WITH STRONG HEADWINDS WHICH I ANTICIPATED IN MY 1 1/2 HR FUEL RESERVE. BASED UPON ESTIMATED FUEL BURN; I THOUGHT I HAD SUFFICIENT FUEL TO COMPLETE THE FLT AS FILED. HOWEVER; UPON REACHING ZZZ; MY FUEL GAUGES INDICATED CLOSE TO EMPTY. I WAS VECTORED AND SEQUENCED FOR THE ILS APCH TO RWY X. THIS WAS TIME AND FUEL CONSUMING AND I BECAME WORRIED THAT I MIGHT NOT HAVE ENOUGH FUEL TO COMPLETE THE ILS APCH AND LNDG. ZZZ WAS IN VFR CONDITIONS AND I COULD SEE THE ARPT AND RWY. I NOTIFIED APCH OF MY MINIMAL FUEL STATUS; THAT I MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO TOLERATE ANY SIGNIFICANT DELAY AND REQUESTED EXPEDITED HANDLING WITH A VISUAL APCH. I WAS ASKED TO ESTIMATE FUEL REMAINING IN MINS WHICH I DID AT 20 MINS (BY FUEL GAUGES). I WAS CLRED FOR LNDG ON RWY Y AND THEN RWY X. I LANDED WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY OR INCIDENT. AFTER LNDG; I WAS TOLD TO CALL TRACON; WHICH I DID. I SPOKE WITH A CTLR WHO WAS VERY UPSET AND ANGRY. HE PROCEEDED TO SCOLD AND REPRIMAND ME AT LENGTH. HE TOLD ME (AMONG OTHER THINGS) THAT: 1) I SHOULD HAVE LANDED ELSEWHERE EARLIER; 2) I JEOPARDIZED THE LIVES OF MY FAMILY (ON-BOARD); 3) I DISREGARDED THE IFR 45 MIN RESERVE FUEL REQUIREMENT. 4) I INCONVENIENCED MANY OTHER ACFT. HE THREATENED TO SANCTION OR VIOLATE ME. I APOLOGIZED REPEATEDLY AND TOLD HIM THAT THIS WAS THE FIRST AND ONLY TIME THIS HAD EVER HAPPENED TO ME. BY THE END OF OUR CONVERSATION; HE SAID HE WOULD NOT FILE ANY PAPERS AGAINST ME. AFTER REFUELING; IT TURNED OUT THAT I HAD 7 GALLONS FUEL AT THE TIME OF TOUCHDOWN. I AM; INDEED; VERY SORRY ABOUT THIS INCIDENT. HOWEVER; IN MY DEFENSE I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT: 1) IT WAS NOT EASY OR RISK FREE TO LAND EARLIER BECAUSE OF WX. 2) WHEN I PASSED THE LAST CANDIDATE ARPT FOR EARLIER LNDG; MY CALCULATIONS AND FUEL GAUGES BOTH SUGGESTED THAT I HAD SUFFICIENT FUEL REMAINING TO COMPLETE THE FLT TO ZZZ SAFELY. 3) I DID NOT DISREGARD OR VIOLATE THE IFR RESERVE FUEL REQUIREMENT. I STARTED THIS FLT WITH A FUEL RESERVE OF 1.5 HRS AND ENDED IT WITH A RESERVE OF 7 GALLONS (AT LEAST 45 MINS). 4) THE FUEL GAUGES INDICATIONS WERE VERY WORRISOME. I THINK I DID THE RIGHT THING BY ASKING ATC FOR HELP. HOWEVER; JUDGING BY THE VERBAL BEATING THAT I SUSTAINED AFTERWARD; IT WOULD APPEAR THAT ATC WOULD PREFER A CRASH RATHER THAN A CALL FOR HELP.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.