Narrative:

Upon landing in cul runway 24R in VFR conditions; just after touchdown; we heard the tower controller clear an air carrier flight for takeoff runway 28. The problem was that we were never informed that we were supposed to land and hold short of runway 28. We both heard this and were quite surprised. I took the controls just prior to 80 KTS and used firm braking to ensure we stopped well short of runway 28. No conflict was created by the situation and the air carrier flight lifted off prior to our runway. But the fact remains; we were expected to do a lahso landing and were never informed. The controller simply did not issue a lahso clearance.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CRJ-900 LANDING ON RUNWAY 24R AT CYUL HEARD ATC CLEAR A DEPARTURE FROM RUNWAY 28 SHORTLY AFTER TOUCHDOWN; ALLEGING NO PRIOR INFORMATION GIVEN REGARDING TRAFFIC OR LAHSO PROCEDURES BEING UTILIZED.

Narrative: UPON LNDG IN CUL RWY 24R IN VFR CONDITIONS; JUST AFTER TOUCHDOWN; WE HEARD THE TWR CTLR CLR AN ACR FLT FOR TKOF RWY 28. THE PROB WAS THAT WE WERE NEVER INFORMED THAT WE WERE SUPPOSED TO LAND AND HOLD SHORT OF RWY 28. WE BOTH HEARD THIS AND WERE QUITE SURPRISED. I TOOK THE CTLS JUST PRIOR TO 80 KTS AND USED FIRM BRAKING TO ENSURE WE STOPPED WELL SHORT OF RWY 28. NO CONFLICT WAS CREATED BY THE SITUATION AND THE ACR FLT LIFTED OFF PRIOR TO OUR RWY. BUT THE FACT REMAINS; WE WERE EXPECTED TO DO A LAHSO LNDG AND WERE NEVER INFORMED. THE CTLR SIMPLY DID NOT ISSUE A LAHSO CLRNC.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of May 2009 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.