37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 830140 |
Time | |
Date | 200903 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | APA.Airport |
State Reference | CO |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Socata (Aerospatiale) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 50 Flight Crew Total 1465 Flight Crew Type 682 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Clearance |
Narrative:
I was being vectored by den approach to land at apa. Approach issued this clearance: 'descend and maintain 8;000 ft; contact tower;' which I read back. Then it occurred to me that I hadn't heard 'cleared visual approach;' which I expected in the circumstance; and been told to expect. I called approach to ask if I was cleared for the visual approach. The frequency was congested and I got no response. I decided to switch to tower frequency and report. The tower frequency was also congested. I was still in the descent to 8;000 ft; and turned toward a base to land thinking I was on a visual approach. I got the tower a few seconds later; and he told me to turn southbound and that he would call my base. A few seconds after that; after I had just started the turn southbound; he called and told me to continue on base and that I was cleared to land. I landed uneventfully. Upon reflection; I realized that I had not been cleared for the visual approach; and so my turn to base was not authorized. I was confused by not having been cleared for the visual; because in all of my flying experience I had never been handed to tower by approach without an approach clearance of some sort. As it was; I was on a vector for downwind; near the approach end of the active runway; and the circumstance suggested an imminent clearance for the visual approach; which I had been told to expect. I would have to speculate as to the reason for this deviation from all of my previous experience; and why approach would hand me to tower with no approach clearance. But; that is what I think happened; and I don't believe I had been cleared for a visual approach. This was reinforced by tower's request for me to turn southbound (back to downwind). I should have 1) persisted in my attempt to get clarification as to my clearance from approach; and 2) remained on the downwind vector until either I received that clarification or made contact with tower.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TBM8; IFR inbound to APA; began descent and altered pattern before appropriate approach clearance was issued.
Narrative: I was being vectored by DEN Approach to land at APA. Approach issued this clearance: 'Descend and maintain 8;000 FT; contact Tower;' which I read back. Then it occurred to me that I hadn't heard 'Cleared visual approach;' which I expected in the circumstance; and been told to expect. I called Approach to ask if I was cleared for the visual approach. The frequency was congested and I got no response. I decided to switch to Tower frequency and report. The Tower frequency was also congested. I was still in the descent to 8;000 FT; and turned toward a base to land thinking I was on a visual approach. I got the Tower a few seconds later; and he told me to turn southbound and that he would call my base. A few seconds after that; after I had just started the turn southbound; he called and told me to continue on base and that I was cleared to land. I landed uneventfully. Upon reflection; I realized that I had not been cleared for the visual approach; and so my turn to base was not authorized. I was confused by not having been cleared for the visual; because in all of my flying experience I had never been handed to Tower by Approach without an approach clearance of some sort. As it was; I was on a vector for downwind; near the approach end of the active runway; and the circumstance suggested an imminent clearance for the visual approach; which I had been told to expect. I would have to speculate as to the reason for this deviation from all of my previous experience; and why Approach would hand me to Tower with no approach clearance. But; that is what I think happened; and I don't believe I had been cleared for a visual approach. This was reinforced by Tower's request for me to turn southbound (back to downwind). I should have 1) persisted in my attempt to get clarification as to my clearance from Approach; and 2) remained on the downwind vector until either I received that clarification or made contact with Tower.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.