Narrative:

The problem was detected during a pre-buy evaluation of the aircraft.the number 1 & 2 engines underwent hot-section area repairs; however; at aircraft return to service; my logbook entry; dated feb 2008; incorrectly stated the 1;800 hour hot-section inspections had been accomplished on each engine. The error in my logbook entry was a result of my misinterpretation of the actual work performed; as described in the technician's description of work performed; and of the description of work performed as stated in FAA forms 8130-3.as a resolution to prevent a recurrence of this type; I resolve to incorporate the following into my daily work ethics. 1. Always follow the maintenance 'personal minimums' checklist provided by the 'airworthiness aviation safety programs'; federal aviation administration. 2. Be more attentive to the accuracy of return to service statements; based on complete review of documented work performed and be certain of my reading and understanding of all supporting documentation; to include conversations with technicians and outside providers to safeguard the accuracy of return to service statements. 3. Perform final review of work performed; to match the return to service statement. Always review my return to service statement for accuracy; prior to placing into the aircraft's permanent record. 4. Utilize the assistance of the chief inspector to review return to service statements. 5. Use the training aids available from the FAA; to stay current with maintenance practices and inspection updates. 6. The items listed above will motivate and discipline me to be more observant and attentive to my licensed privileges to work in this career field.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: An Inspector reports he incorrectly stated in a Beechjet-400A logbook; the 1800 hour hot-section inspections had been accomplished on both JT15D-5 engines. The discrepancy was detected during a pre-buy evaluation of the aircraft.

Narrative: The problem was detected during a pre-buy evaluation of the aircraft.The number 1 & 2 engines underwent hot-section area repairs; however; at aircraft return to service; my logbook entry; dated Feb 2008; incorrectly stated the 1;800 hour hot-section inspections had been accomplished on each engine. The error in my logbook entry was a result of my misinterpretation of the actual work performed; as described in the technician's description of work performed; and of the description of work performed as stated in FAA Forms 8130-3.As a resolution to prevent a recurrence of this type; I resolve to incorporate the following into my daily work ethics. 1. Always follow the Maintenance 'Personal Minimums' checklist provided by the 'Airworthiness Aviation Safety Programs'; Federal Aviation Administration. 2. Be more attentive to the accuracy of return to service statements; based on complete review of documented work performed and be certain of my reading and understanding of all supporting documentation; to include conversations with technicians and outside providers to safeguard the accuracy of return to service statements. 3. Perform final review of work performed; to match the return to service statement. Always review my return to service statement for accuracy; prior to placing into the aircraft's permanent record. 4. Utilize the assistance of the Chief Inspector to review return to service statements. 5. Use the training aids available from the FAA; to stay current with maintenance practices and inspection updates. 6. The items listed above will motivate and discipline me to be more observant and attentive to my licensed privileges to work in this career field.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.