37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 841340 |
Time | |
Date | 200906 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | PMC Performance/Thrust Management Computer |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
Unknown initial failure/lockout of FMS system gave faulty indication to engine EPR limit during takeoff roll. During the takeoff roll the EPR limit showed the granite bars at 1.80. As I aligned the eprs after the auto throttle had disconnected twice it became apparent that a lower power setting was being indicated by the tri than was necessary. Later in the flight; the FMS started acting strangely and then finally quit altogether and we reverted to manual navigation procedure per the checklist. After review during climb out; I believe the tri; being linked to the FMS; failed during the takeoff roll and the orange EPR bars 'froze' at the point of failure; causing the lower than necessary power setting to cause a longer than ideal takeoff distance. If this was the case; such failure is very confusing and subtle; as there was no warning that the to button on the tri had failed.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: MD80 First Officer reports TRI failure during takeoff causing autothrottles to disconnect and EPR bars to indicate less than required thrust. Low thrust produced a long takeoff roll. The FMS failed later in flight and may have caused the TRI computer failure.
Narrative: Unknown initial failure/lockout of FMS system gave faulty indication to engine EPR limit during takeoff roll. During the takeoff roll the EPR limit showed the granite bars at 1.80. As I aligned the EPRs after the auto throttle had disconnected twice it became apparent that a lower power setting was being indicated by the TRI than was necessary. Later in the flight; the FMS started acting strangely and then finally quit altogether and we reverted to manual navigation procedure per the checklist. After review during climb out; I believe the TRI; being linked to the FMS; failed during the takeoff roll and the orange EPR bars 'froze' at the point of failure; causing the lower than necessary power setting to cause a longer than ideal takeoff distance. If this was the case; such failure is very confusing and subtle; as there was no warning that the TO button on the TRI had failed.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.