Narrative:

I was flying a lear 60 to miv on a part 135 revenue leg. We were given a descent to 4000 ft MSL 50 miles from the airport. We obtained the AWOS; which stated the winds as 08005. Runway 10/28 is 6000 ft; and runway 32 is 5000 ft. While approaching the airport; I stayed well west due to the multiple TCAS targets over the airport and asked for direct to the FAF for the ILS 10 approach. My first officer announced our position and intention to land runway 10. A pilot flying a cessna 182 reported that he was downwind to runway 32; and that '32 was the active runway that everyone else was using.' my first officer again announced our intention to land runway 10 and stated our position at about a 7 mile final. We were unable to land runway 32; and our safest option was to land straight-in on runway 10. It kept us clear of all traffic. At that time; the pilot in the C182 stated again that he was downwind runway 32; and that everyone else is using runway 32. His tone was angry and unreasonable in his transmissions. My first officer again stated our position at about 3 mile final to runway 10. The C182 was about 3/4 of the way on downwind; another target was about 1/3 of the way on downwind to runway 32; and another traffic was just turning crosswind to runway 32. Everything was working perfectly; until my first officer noticed the C182 intentionally banking steeply and diving for runway 32. The C182 pilot then said he was short final to runway 32; landing runway 32. My first officer later stated it looked like two people were fighting for the controls. The aircraft turned towards a normal downwind twice; and each time was corrected hard over to short final. I contemplated going around; I was already slowed to vref since on an 8 mile final; and I was trying to judge what the other pilot's actions would be. If I had gone around; my concern would be climbing into him or maneuvering while dangerously slow to avoid the conflict. While we were about 100 ft AGL; the C182 initiated a go-around. We landed normally. 30 minutes after landing; my first officer told me the flight instructor wanted to pick a fight. I tried to avoid the situation; but the flight instructor started calling me names and yelling. He told me that I was lucky his student was onboard; and that the student initiated the go-around. He said his intentions were to stop the aircraft in the crossing intersection to force me to go-around. Some people pulled him aside; and I left the building without further incident.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: Lear 60 Captain landing straight in to Runway 10 reports conflict with C182 in traffic pattern for Runway 32. Runway 32 was too short for the Lear and the C182 pilot attempted to turn an early base and final to apparently conflict with the Lear. The C182 pilot went around.

Narrative: I was flying a Lear 60 to MIV on a Part 135 revenue leg. We were given a descent to 4000 FT MSL 50 miles from the airport. We obtained the AWOS; which stated the winds as 08005. Runway 10/28 is 6000 FT; and Runway 32 is 5000 FT. While approaching the airport; I stayed well west due to the multiple TCAS targets over the airport and asked for direct to the FAF for the ILS 10 Approach. My First Officer announced our position and intention to land Runway 10. A pilot flying a Cessna 182 reported that he was downwind to Runway 32; and that '32 was the active runway that everyone else was using.' My First Officer again announced our intention to land Runway 10 and stated our position at about a 7 mile final. We were unable to land Runway 32; and our safest option was to land straight-in on Runway 10. It kept us clear of all traffic. At that time; the pilot in the C182 stated again that he was downwind Runway 32; and that everyone else is using Runway 32. His tone was angry and unreasonable in his transmissions. My first officer again stated our position at about 3 mile final to Runway 10. The C182 was about 3/4 of the way on downwind; another target was about 1/3 of the way on downwind to Runway 32; and another traffic was just turning crosswind to Runway 32. Everything was working perfectly; until my First Officer noticed the C182 intentionally banking steeply and diving for Runway 32. The C182 pilot then said he was short final to Runway 32; landing Runway 32. My First Officer later stated it looked like two people were fighting for the controls. The aircraft turned towards a normal downwind twice; and each time was corrected hard over to short final. I contemplated going around; I was already slowed to Vref since on an 8 mile final; and I was trying to judge what the other pilot's actions would be. If I had gone around; my concern would be climbing into him or maneuvering while dangerously slow to avoid the conflict. While we were about 100 FT AGL; the C182 initiated a go-around. We landed normally. 30 minutes after landing; my First Officer told me the flight instructor wanted to pick a fight. I tried to avoid the situation; but the flight instructor started calling me names and yelling. He told me that I was lucky his student was onboard; and that the student initiated the go-around. He said his intentions were to stop the aircraft in the crossing intersection to force me to go-around. Some people pulled him aside; and I left the building without further incident.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.