37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 917212 |
Time | |
Date | 201011 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | W00.Airport |
State Reference | MD |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Skyhawk 172/Cutlass 172 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Departure |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Developmental |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Airspace Violation All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
I was working a C172 off of a satellite airport. The aircraft departed and I radar identified it and instructed him to climb to 5;000. When he was five miles north of the departure airport he requested direct EMI; so I coordinated direct EMI via the land line with the sector that the aircraft was being handed off to. The other controller approved direct EMI and asked what altitude the aircraft was climbing to. I told him 5;000. I instructed the C172 to proceed direct EMI. During this time bwi was in the process of switching from a west to east operation. I am aware that in an east operation the C172 would be in final's airspace; but I was not made aware that a runway change was being made. I noticed a B737 approaching from the south on my scope heading northwest and descending. I did not know what altitude this aircraft was descending to; or that bwi was in the middle of a runway change; so I called traffic and lit my aircraft up on the final controller's scope. The C172 did not see the traffic. The collision alert went off and I observed the B737 begin to climb. Shortly thereafter the supervisor of another area came over to me and instructed me to put the C172 on a 300 heading and switch him to the next sector.recommendations: 1. Make the other areas aware of runway changes occurring at major airports; especially when it affects the airspace so drastically. 2. Make sure all the point outs are made to all sectors that will be involved.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Separation was lost when a PCT Controller coordinated a direct routing that allowed an aircraft to enter BWI airspace. The reporter claimed a runway change at BWI was not coordinated.
Narrative: I was working a C172 off of a satellite airport. The aircraft departed and I Radar identified it and instructed him to climb to 5;000. When he was five miles north of the departure airport he requested direct EMI; so I coordinated direct EMI via the land line with the sector that the aircraft was being handed off to. The other Controller approved direct EMI and asked what altitude the aircraft was climbing to. I told him 5;000. I instructed the C172 to proceed direct EMI. During this time BWI was in the process of switching from a west to east operation. I am aware that in an east operation the C172 would be in Final's airspace; but I was not made aware that a runway change was being made. I noticed a B737 approaching from the south on my scope heading northwest and descending. I did not know what altitude this aircraft was descending to; or that BWI was in the middle of a runway change; so I called traffic and lit my aircraft up on the Final Controller's scope. The C172 did not see the traffic. The Collision Alert went off and I observed the B737 begin to climb. Shortly thereafter the Supervisor of another area came over to me and instructed me to put the C172 on a 300 heading and switch him to the next sector.Recommendations: 1. Make the other areas aware of runway changes occurring at major airports; especially when it affects the airspace so drastically. 2. Make sure all the point outs are made to all sectors that will be involved.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.