37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 919881 |
Time | |
Date | 201011 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft Low Wing 1 Eng Fixed Gear |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying Instructor |
Qualification | Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Flight Engineer Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 60 Flight Crew Total 26200 Flight Crew Type 1000 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Private |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 4 Flight Crew Total 333 Flight Crew Type 178 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Ground Excursion Runway Inflight Event / Encounter Loss Of Aircraft Control |
Narrative:
The purpose of the flight was recurrent training for the aircraft owner who; although rated and current in the aircraft; was not proficient for solo or PIC duties. We returned to the airport after an hour of air work and made a straight-in approach to the runway in use. The winds were calm and visibility good. The approach was normal in most aspects; however the pilot tried to flare for landing at too high an altitude. Because of cg (center of gravity) limitations; the normal landing in this type of aircraft is a wheel landing. I helped the pilot correct his glide path; and the touchdown was very good. During the rollout I recommended that the tail be kept up while speed bled off. I did this because the aircraft is not equipped with brakes on the right side; so I would be unable to exert full control when the tail is down. The aircraft is not equipped with a steerable tail wheel. When the speed approached 40-50 mph I instructed the pilot to lower the tail; which he did. The rollout continued in a normal fashion. Once the tail was down and we had rolled straight for a few seconds; I suggested that the pilot now start braking. When the pilot started applying brakes; the aircraft pulled to the right; about ten degrees off the runway heading. The pilot became agitated. I pushed on the right rudder pedal and found that I was unable to move it. I believe that at this point the pilot was pushing on both brake pedals with no rudder input; effectively preventing me from moving the rudder at all. I believe (and skid marks support) that at this point both wheels were locked and the aircraft continued turning leaving the runway with the nose about ninety degrees to the runway heading. When the aircraft left the paved surface of the runway the left main gear strut failed; followed immediately by failure of the right main gear strut; and the aircraft came to rest about twenty feet off the paved surface pointed about 100 degrees off runway heading. The pilot; who had been in this situation before; turned off all electrical switches; the fuel selector; and initiated egress from the cockpit. Emergency equipment was summoned; I assume by ATC; and arrived a few minutes later. There were no injuries; and damage was limited to the landing gear; propeller; and paint.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A Swift Globe GC-1B pilot undergoing recurrent landing practice with a CFI ground looped and the aircraft left the runway. The aircraft suffered strut; propeller and fuselage damage.
Narrative: The purpose of the flight was recurrent training for the aircraft owner who; although rated and current in the aircraft; was not proficient for solo or PIC duties. We returned to the airport after an hour of air work and made a straight-in approach to the runway in use. The winds were calm and visibility good. The approach was normal in most aspects; however the pilot tried to flare for landing at too high an altitude. Because of CG (center of gravity) limitations; the normal landing in this type of aircraft is a wheel landing. I helped the pilot correct his glide path; and the touchdown was very good. During the rollout I recommended that the tail be kept up while speed bled off. I did this because the aircraft is not equipped with brakes on the right side; so I would be unable to exert full control when the tail is down. The aircraft is not equipped with a steerable tail wheel. When the speed approached 40-50 MPH I instructed the pilot to lower the tail; which he did. The rollout continued in a normal fashion. Once the tail was down and we had rolled straight for a few seconds; I suggested that the pilot now start braking. When the pilot started applying brakes; the aircraft pulled to the right; about ten degrees off the runway heading. The pilot became agitated. I pushed on the right rudder pedal and found that I was unable to move it. I believe that at this point the pilot was pushing on both brake pedals with no rudder input; effectively preventing me from moving the rudder at all. I believe (and skid marks support) that at this point both wheels were locked and the aircraft continued turning leaving the runway with the nose about ninety degrees to the runway heading. When the aircraft left the paved surface of the runway the left main gear strut failed; followed immediately by failure of the right main gear strut; and the aircraft came to rest about twenty feet off the paved surface pointed about 100 degrees off runway heading. The pilot; who had been in this situation before; turned off all electrical switches; the fuel selector; and initiated egress from the cockpit. Emergency equipment was summoned; I assume by ATC; and arrived a few minutes later. There were no injuries; and damage was limited to the landing gear; propeller; and paint.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.