37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 944345 |
Time | |
Date | 201104 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | PHL.TRACON |
State Reference | PA |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | EMB ERJ 170/175 ER&LR |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Any Unknown or Unlisted Aircraft Manufacturer |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Approach |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Phl west flow landing 27R. The E170 flight was on a vector southbound toward the localizer for 27R and was descended to 2;100 and left the bravo airspace; VFR traffic was at 1;900 outside the bravo airspace northbound. I called the VFR traffic to the E170; pilot responded looking. The E170 responded to an TCAS-RA; after the RA the E170 flight descended back down to 2;100 ft and was cleared for the approach. I descended the E170 to 2;100 because I was planning on a turn at the approach gate (final approach fix altitude is 2;100) and I wanted the flight to be below the glide slope for the ILS approach. To prevent the recurrence of this event; traffic should not be descended below the bravo airspace. The bottom altitude of the shelf of the bravo airspace in the area the E170 was in is 3;000.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: PHL Controller described a TCAS RA event when traffic being vectored for the ILS 27R was issued a descent below the Class B and triggered an RA; the reporter suggesting Class B revisions to accommodate this type of circumstance.
Narrative: PHL West flow landing 27R. The E170 flight was on a vector southbound toward the localizer for 27R and was descended to 2;100 and left the Bravo airspace; VFR traffic was at 1;900 outside the Bravo airspace northbound. I called the VFR traffic to the E170; pilot responded looking. The E170 responded to an TCAS-RA; after the RA the E170 flight descended back down to 2;100 FT and was cleared for the approach. I descended the E170 to 2;100 because I was planning on a turn at the approach gate (final approach fix altitude is 2;100) and I wanted the flight to be below the glide slope for the ILS approach. To prevent the recurrence of this event; traffic should not be descended below the Bravo airspace. The bottom altitude of the shelf of the Bravo airspace in the area the E170 was in is 3;000.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.