37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 957336 |
Time | |
Date | 201107 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Aircraft Cooling System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
During climb we experienced a hot air valve ECAM. The ECAM procedure was to turn off the hot air valve to isolate the duct overheat in the system. The switch had no effect on the hot air valve; leaving the system with no protection from the overheat. Maintenance was contacted for further information and input. We talked with dispatch and coordinated a return to the departure airport. Upon leveling off and descending; the valve finally closed on its own. With the overheat isolated; we decided to hold and burn off fuel to the maximum landing weight. During our holding; the hot air valve started opening and closing. With the system uncontrollable and unstable; we decided to descend into the airport. The decision was made to land overweight due to the unknown; uncontrollable; and overheated system. The risk of landing overweight was minimal when compared to the risk of an overheated system in this state. An emergency was declared; and the landing was completed without incident.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An A320 ECAM alerted HOT AIR VALVE but the ECAM procedure did not close the HOT AIR VALVE so the crew declared an emergency and returned to the departure airport for an overweight landing.
Narrative: During climb we experienced a hot air valve ECAM. The ECAM procedure was to turn off the hot air valve to isolate the duct overheat in the system. The switch had no effect on the hot air valve; leaving the system with no protection from the overheat. Maintenance was contacted for further information and input. We talked with Dispatch and coordinated a return to the departure airport. Upon leveling off and descending; the valve finally closed on its own. With the overheat isolated; we decided to hold and burn off fuel to the maximum landing weight. During our holding; the hot air valve started opening and closing. With the system uncontrollable and unstable; we decided to descend into the airport. The decision was made to land overweight due to the unknown; uncontrollable; and overheated system. The risk of landing overweight was minimal when compared to the risk of an overheated system in this state. An emergency was declared; and the landing was completed without incident.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.