37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 957478 |
Time | |
Date | 201107 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | BIL.TRACON |
State Reference | MT |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 240 Flight Crew Total 20000 Flight Crew Type 8000 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 358 Flight Crew Total 14500 Flight Crew Type 6700 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Altitude Crossing Restriction Not Met Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Enroute we reviewed the bil notams because of construction on the field and volume of notams for a small field. With bil ILS runway 28R approach north/a; we decided to fly the VOR runway 28R. Since it was VMC; this approach was to be for proficiency. While on the 16 DME arc southeast of the bil VOR; we descended to the 5;700 ft. Altitude per the approach plate. At some point; ATC mentioned that about a year ago; the altitude was changed to 6;200 ft. We confirmed the plate number; date; and altitude we had in the cockpit. Once parked at the gate we again reviewed the notams. We discovered we had overlooked NOTAM 13/2; fdc 02829/10 with the altitude change. We both had reviewed the papers earlier and done so independently; yet both of us missed this change. Although the approach was conducted for practice and in VMC; we should have maintained the 6;200 ft. Altitude. Though incumbent on us to catch the change; we both wondered why a NOTAM would be nearly one year old and not incorporated into a revised approach plate. That does not relieve us of catching the altitude change; but it does beg the question how long does a NOTAM remain before action/revisions are published?
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: BIL TRACON notified an air carrier crew flying the Runway 28R VOR approach that a NOTAM changed the minimum altitude on the ARC from NELWN to 6;200 FT. The crew questioned why the commercial chart had not been modified.
Narrative: Enroute we reviewed the BIL NOTAMs because of construction on the field and volume of NOTAMs for a small field. With BIL ILS Runway 28R approach N/A; we decided to fly the VOR Runway 28R. Since it was VMC; this approach was to be for proficiency. While on the 16 DME arc southeast of the BIL VOR; we descended to the 5;700 FT. altitude per the approach plate. At some point; ATC mentioned that about a year ago; the altitude was changed to 6;200 FT. We confirmed the plate number; date; and altitude we had in the cockpit. Once parked at the gate we again reviewed the NOTAMs. We discovered we had overlooked NOTAM 13/2; FDC 02829/10 with the altitude change. We both had reviewed the papers earlier and done so independently; yet both of us missed this change. Although the approach was conducted for practice and in VMC; we should have maintained the 6;200 FT. altitude. Though incumbent on us to catch the change; we both wondered why a NOTAM would be nearly one year old and not incorporated into a revised approach plate. That does not relieve us of catching the altitude change; but it does beg the question how long does a NOTAM remain before action/revisions are published?
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.