37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 961506 |
Time | |
Date | 201107 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Super King Air 350 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 52 Flight Crew Total 6426 Flight Crew Type 900 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 54 Flight Crew Total 1729 Flight Crew Type 1269 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe |
Narrative:
During the approach to landing phase of a part 91 corporate flight; we failed to get proper indication that the right main landing gear was in the down and locked position. We abandoned the approach and proceeded to troubleshoot the situation per the approved aircraft abnormal checklist; which failed to resolve the issue. We elected to divert the flight for reasons including good runway length and width; excellent crash response capability and its proximity to our home base. We orbited north of the airport for approximately one hour to reduce fuel load; brief the passengers on safety and evacuation procedures and commands; coordinate with the tower supervisor and crash responders; and additional troubleshooting. Once these items were complete; we officially declared the emergency and proceeded inbound for a visual approach and landing; which was completed without incident. As PIC; I feel the decisions and actions of both me and my copilot were prudent and executed in a professional manner.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: BE350 flight crew experiences an unsafe gear indication during approach and goes around. Troubleshooting does not resolve the issue and the crew elects to divert to an airport with a longer runway. A normal landing ensues.
Narrative: During the approach to landing phase of a Part 91 corporate flight; we failed to get proper indication that the right main landing gear was in the down and locked position. We abandoned the approach and proceeded to troubleshoot the situation per the approved aircraft abnormal checklist; which failed to resolve the issue. We elected to divert the flight for reasons including good runway length and width; excellent crash response capability and its proximity to our home base. We orbited north of the airport for approximately one hour to reduce fuel load; brief the passengers on safety and evacuation procedures and commands; coordinate with the Tower Supervisor and crash responders; and additional troubleshooting. Once these items were complete; we officially declared the emergency and proceeded inbound for a visual approach and landing; which was completed without incident. As PIC; I feel the decisions and actions of both me and my copilot were prudent and executed in a professional manner.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.