37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 961723 |
Time | |
Date | 201107 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZDV.ARTCC |
State Reference | CO |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Cessna 210 Centurion / Turbo Centurion 210C 210D |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Enroute |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Clearance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Aircraft X departed ege VFR and called me requesting his IFR clearance. I issued him his code and verified his mode-C. He informed me he was maneuvering reference the terrain in his climb. I had aircraft Y on approach to ege joining the localizer. I worried that aircraft X might get far enough north to become a factor with aircraft Y; however I asked aircraft X if he could maintain his own terrain and obstruction clearance to 170; received an affirmative response and cleared him to his destination; wwr; reiterating that he was to maintain his own terrain and obstruction clearance to 170. In my mind I cleared him to climb VFR to 170 which would have separated him from aircraft Y. The way I actually cleared him did not separate him. I believed I had issued the correct clearance until hearing the tape. Recommendation; the only recommendation I would make is to be precise with your language; and try to make sure to say what you mean.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZDV Controller described a loss of separation event between an EGE IFR arrival and departure resulting from an inappropriate use of procedures and phraseology.
Narrative: Aircraft X departed EGE VFR and called me requesting his IFR clearance. I issued him his code and verified his Mode-C. He informed me he was maneuvering reference the terrain in his climb. I had Aircraft Y on approach to EGE joining the LOC. I worried that Aircraft X might get far enough north to become a factor with Aircraft Y; however I asked Aircraft X if he could maintain his own terrain and obstruction clearance to 170; received an affirmative response and cleared him to his destination; WWR; reiterating that he was to maintain his own terrain and obstruction clearance to 170. In my mind I cleared him to climb VFR to 170 which would have separated him from Aircraft Y. The way I actually cleared him did not separate him. I believed I had issued the correct clearance until hearing the tape. Recommendation; the only recommendation I would make is to be precise with your language; and try to make sure to say what you mean.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.