37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 963016 |
Time | |
Date | 201108 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Weight And Balance Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
Our tlr [takeoff/landing report] was based on landing on runway 23R at our destination. 23R was notamed closed but disregarded as 23L/5R was open. I did not associate the tlr runway and the NOTAM until reviewing the release for the next flight which was a departure out of the airport. When I verified the tlr runway for departure was the open runway I sensed that I had not made that verification on our previous arrival. Rummaging in the trash I found the old release and discovered that it had in fact used 23R as the planned landing runway at our destination. I don't believe any portion of the flight was conducted unsafely; only that it was planned to a closed runway.notams have become so numerous that it is difficult to give them the attention that is needed to digest all of the information and separate the important information from the non-pertinent. Many of the notams do not apply to a particular flight but they are included in the weather package. It is difficult to thoroughly review each one every flight. It would be a great improvement to safety if the non-pertinent notams were culled out of the weather packages.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Prodded by his failure to note that the arrival runway planned for his flight was NOTAM'd closed; a CRJ Captain addressed the difficulties inherent in attempting to review the large number of NOTAMs provided for flights; many of which are not pertinent to the flight in question.
Narrative: Our TLR [Takeoff/Landing Report] was based on landing on Runway 23R at our destination. 23R was NOTAMed closed but disregarded as 23L/5R was open. I did not associate the TLR runway and the NOTAM until reviewing the release for the next flight which was a departure out of the airport. When I verified the TLR runway for departure was the open runway I sensed that I had not made that verification on our previous arrival. Rummaging in the trash I found the old release and discovered that it had in fact used 23R as the planned landing runway at our destination. I don't believe any portion of the flight was conducted unsafely; only that it was planned to a closed runway.NOTAMs have become so numerous that it is difficult to give them the attention that is needed to digest all of the information and separate the important information from the non-pertinent. Many of the NOTAMs do not apply to a particular flight but they are included in the weather package. It is difficult to thoroughly review each one every flight. It would be a great improvement to safety if the non-pertinent NOTAMs were culled out of the weather packages.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.