37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 965973 |
Time | |
Date | 201108 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A320 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | EICAS/EAD/ECAM |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 200 Flight Crew Total 18000 Flight Crew Type 6000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
Extended delay due to number 2 engine overspeed ECAM [message]. We have a company bulletin for this issue. I am concerned that it was assumed; this is an airbus glitch; and not a real problem. It appears that one of the solutions; (six start attempts); is beyond the scope of the flight manual (FM) limits without proper cooling time[for the engine starter]. In the maintenance history; the aircraft had displayed the fault and was cleared. Then on the inbound flight the crew reported the same fault. Contract maintenance cleared the fault and the flight attempted to operate. As soon as number 1 engine start switch was placed to 'run;' we got the number 2 engine overspeed message. After number 1 engine stabilized and we contacted maintenance control; the message cleared.maintenance control noted the problem; which broke [voided] the maintenance release (M/right) and then they issued a new M/right. As soon as we started number 2 engine; the number 2 engine overspeed ECAM message reappeared. Called maintenance control again and they advised to return to gate. Mechanics and parts were flown in on the xa:30 pm flight and apparently they first tried to clear the software issue; then changed the engine fuel management unit (fmu). The problem did not clear. Line maintenance indicates you need to start the engine three times for the message to unlock. Word of mouth in the mechanic group indicates it requires as many as six starts. On start number 5 the problem cleared. Apparently there has been a component change/upgrade and there is a conflict in the software that airbus has not been able to solve.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An A320 crew has an extended departure delay due to a recurring number 2 engine overspeed ECAM message. Efforts to 'clear' the software issue were not successful; resulting in a number 2 Fuel Management Unit (FMU) change.
Narrative: Extended delay due to number 2 Engine Overspeed ECAM [message]. We have a company bulletin for this issue. I am concerned that it was assumed; this is an Airbus glitch; and not a real problem. It appears that one of the solutions; (six start attempts); is beyond the scope of the Flight Manual (FM) limits without proper cooling time[for the engine starter]. In the Maintenance history; the aircraft had displayed the fault and was cleared. Then on the inbound flight the crew reported the same fault. Contract Maintenance cleared the fault and the flight attempted to operate. As soon as number 1 Engine Start Switch was placed to 'run;' we got the number 2 engine Overspeed message. After number 1 engine stabilized and we contacted Maintenance Control; the message cleared.Maintenance Control noted the problem; which broke [voided] the Maintenance Release (M/R) and then they issued a new M/R. As soon as we started number 2 engine; the number 2 Engine Overspeed ECAM message reappeared. Called Maintenance Control again and they advised to return to gate. Mechanics and parts were flown in on the XA:30 pm flight and apparently they first tried to clear the software issue; then changed the engine Fuel Management Unit (FMU). The problem did not clear. Line Maintenance indicates you need to start the engine three times for the message to unlock. Word of mouth in the mechanic group indicates it requires as many as six starts. On start number 5 the problem cleared. Apparently there has been a component change/upgrade and there is a conflict in the software that Airbus has not been able to solve.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.