37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 97788 |
Time | |
Date | 198810 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : bna |
State Reference | TN |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | ground other : taxi |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 160 flight time total : 2400 flight time type : 400 |
ASRS Report | 97788 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 180 flight time total : 3200 flight time type : 1200 |
ASRS Report | 97235 |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway non adherence : clearance other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
En route to bna approach control briefed us to expect runway 2L for landing. We put in a request for runway 2R (shorter runway) for 2 reasons: to help out ATC during a high traffic time of day and to expedite our taxi time from the runway to the ramp. Our request was granted. We landed runway 2R. On the landing roll after the aircraft was slowed and under control, tower instructed us to taxi to the end and turn left on taxiway charlie. One of the reasons we requested runway 2R was to taxi across the approach end of runway 31 at charlie 9 to lima 5 into our ramp located at concourse D. The captain turned right at echo 4. At this point we contacted ground and told them we turned off at echo 4. Our taxi request to cross runway 31 at charlie 9 was denied. Our taxi instruction now was to turn left on taxiway charlie, cross '20L' and turn right on bravo and hold short of runway 31. We taxied down taxiway charlie. We both saw taxiway bravo and proceeded past bravo and were on our way to crossing an active runway (2L) when ground immediately burst onto the radio and told us to stop and hold our position. The problem is 2-FOLD. We as a crew were not too familiar with the airport layout and we turned off the runway at echo 4 when we were told to turn left on charlie at the end of runway 2R. This is our fault. The confusion is that we were at echo 4, were told to turn left on taxiway charlie and cross runway 20L. We had just landed runway 2R. We both thought we were to cross runway 2L as we had every intention to do even when we saw taxiway bravo pass. We feel our taxi instructions were much a contributing factor. What I cannot figure out is why we were told to cross '20L.' runway 2R was the active runway. Why were we not told to cross runway 2R? This would have alleviated the problem (along with the fact we didn't do what we were told by tower.' there would not have been any confusion with the parallel runways. This is not the first time I have run into this problem of being cleared across inactive runways which are active. If an aircraft is to cross an active runway it should be stated as to the active runway which is active, despite where your position is on the airport.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR SMT FAILED TO FOLLOW TAXI INSTRUCTIONS TWICE AND NEAR RWY TRANSGRESSION.
Narrative: ENRTE TO BNA APCH CTL BRIEFED US TO EXPECT RWY 2L FOR LNDG. WE PUT IN A REQUEST FOR RWY 2R (SHORTER RWY) FOR 2 REASONS: TO HELP OUT ATC DURING A HIGH TFC TIME OF DAY AND TO EXPEDITE OUR TAXI TIME FROM THE RWY TO THE RAMP. OUR REQUEST WAS GRANTED. WE LANDED RWY 2R. ON THE LNDG ROLL AFTER THE ACFT WAS SLOWED AND UNDER CTL, TWR INSTRUCTED US TO TAXI TO THE END AND TURN LEFT ON TXWY CHARLIE. ONE OF THE REASONS WE REQUESTED RWY 2R WAS TO TAXI ACROSS THE APCH END OF RWY 31 AT CHARLIE 9 TO LIMA 5 INTO OUR RAMP LOCATED AT CONCOURSE D. THE CAPT TURNED RIGHT AT ECHO 4. AT THIS POINT WE CONTACTED GND AND TOLD THEM WE TURNED OFF AT ECHO 4. OUR TAXI REQUEST TO CROSS RWY 31 AT CHARLIE 9 WAS DENIED. OUR TAXI INSTRUCTION NOW WAS TO TURN LEFT ON TXWY CHARLIE, CROSS '20L' AND TURN RIGHT ON BRAVO AND HOLD SHORT OF RWY 31. WE TAXIED DOWN TXWY CHARLIE. WE BOTH SAW TXWY BRAVO AND PROCEEDED PAST BRAVO AND WERE ON OUR WAY TO XING AN ACTIVE RWY (2L) WHEN GND IMMEDIATELY BURST ONTO THE RADIO AND TOLD US TO STOP AND HOLD OUR POS. THE PROB IS 2-FOLD. WE AS A CREW WERE NOT TOO FAMILIAR WITH THE ARPT LAYOUT AND WE TURNED OFF THE RWY AT ECHO 4 WHEN WE WERE TOLD TO TURN LEFT ON CHARLIE AT THE END OF RWY 2R. THIS IS OUR FAULT. THE CONFUSION IS THAT WE WERE AT ECHO 4, WERE TOLD TO TURN L ON TXWY CHARLIE AND CROSS RWY 20L. WE HAD JUST LANDED RWY 2R. WE BOTH THOUGHT WE WERE TO CROSS RWY 2L AS WE HAD EVERY INTENTION TO DO EVEN WHEN WE SAW TXWY BRAVO PASS. WE FEEL OUR TAXI INSTRUCTIONS WERE MUCH A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR. WHAT I CANNOT FIGURE OUT IS WHY WE WERE TOLD TO CROSS '20L.' RWY 2R WAS THE ACTIVE RWY. WHY WERE WE NOT TOLD TO CROSS RWY 2R? THIS WOULD HAVE ALLEVIATED THE PROB (ALONG WITH THE FACT WE DIDN'T DO WHAT WE WERE TOLD BY TWR.' THERE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN ANY CONFUSION WITH THE PARALLEL RWYS. THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME I HAVE RUN INTO THIS PROB OF BEING CLRED ACROSS INACTIVE RWYS WHICH ARE ACTIVE. IF AN ACFT IS TO CROSS AN ACTIVE RWY IT SHOULD BE STATED AS TO THE ACTIVE RWY WHICH IS ACTIVE, DESPITE WHERE YOUR POS IS ON THE ARPT.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.