37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 981775 |
Time | |
Date | 201111 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Other Holding Pattern |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | MD-80 Series (DC-9-80) Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Descent |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Enroute |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
I was providing OJT to a cpc at combined sectors. We were holding for ZZZ and working several other aircraft through the sector around the holders. Air carrier X at FL250; inbound to ZZZ1 needed to be descended across abc at FL190. Air carrier Y was in holding over abcde at FL220. There was another aircraft in holding at FL210 below air carrier Y. The trainee descended the holder from FL210 to 17;000 ft; then descended air carrier X from FL250 to FL220. Then he descended air carrier Y from FL220 to FL210; and later to FL190. I did not catch that the order of the clearances was incorrect. Prior to the loss of separation; I advised the supervisor that the phone was going to ring and that we were using FAA7110.65 5-5-5B. I was advised that an oe had occurred. Trainers should not be lulled into a false sense of security assuming that a cpc-it can actually separate airplanes.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Enroute Controller described a loss of separation event during holding and multiple vectors around the holding pattern. The reporter failed to hear the incorrect order of descent clearances issued by the trainee.
Narrative: I was providing OJT to a CPC at combined sectors. We were holding for ZZZ and working several other aircraft through the sector around the holders. Air Carrier X at FL250; inbound to ZZZ1 needed to be descended across ABC at FL190. Air Carrier Y was in holding over ABCDE at FL220. There was another aircraft in holding at FL210 below Air Carrier Y. The trainee descended the holder from FL210 to 17;000 FT; then descended Air Carrier X from FL250 to FL220. Then he descended Air Carrier Y from FL220 to FL210; and later to FL190. I did not catch that the order of the clearances was incorrect. Prior to the loss of separation; I advised the Supervisor that the phone was going to ring and that we were using FAA7110.65 5-5-5B. I was advised that an OE had occurred. Trainers should not be lulled into a false sense of security assuming that a CPC-IT can actually separate airplanes.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.