37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 983518 |
Time | |
Date | 201112 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Embraer Jet Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Cockpit Window |
Person 1 | |
Function | Other / Unknown |
Qualification | Maintenance Airframe Maintenance Powerplant |
Person 2 | |
Function | Other / Unknown |
Qualification | Maintenance Powerplant Maintenance Airframe |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural MEL |
Narrative:
December 2011; an embraer jet aircraft had an inbound discrepancy [regarding] loud squeal coming from captain's windshield area. Maintenance was doing pressurization checks and retorqued the windshield. No help. Maintenance called me at maintenance control to report what had been done and asked if they could have MEL 21-18 issued so we would not loose the flight. I put maintenance on hold to talk to my equipment coordinator and dispatcher; inquiring if we could do a non-pressurized flight. They both agreed that a non-pressurized flight was ok as far as the weather was concerned. I then issued MEL 21-18. Maintenance deactivated the pressurization system and the aircraft departed. The event happened due to inexperience with company policies. I thought that deferring the next higher assembly was not an issue. We were trying to move a flight; but I did not feel any pressure from that. Suggest relying on the team concept that is put in place and ask more questions. Study the MEL's more to understand what can and cannot be done with each.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A Maintenance Controller; Maintenance Supervisor and a Line Mechanic report about their involvement with the deferral of a Captain's forward windshield squeal on an Embraer aircraft; by deferring a functioning Pressurization System.
Narrative: December 2011; an Embraer jet aircraft had an inbound discrepancy [regarding] loud squeal coming from Captain's windshield area. Maintenance was doing Pressurization Checks and retorqued the windshield. No help. Maintenance called me at Maintenance Control to report what had been done and asked if they could have MEL 21-18 issued so we would not loose the flight. I put Maintenance on hold to talk to my Equipment Coordinator and Dispatcher; inquiring if we could do a non-pressurized flight. They both agreed that a non-pressurized flight was OK as far as the weather was concerned. I then issued MEL 21-18. Maintenance deactivated the Pressurization System and the aircraft departed. The event happened due to inexperience with company policies. I thought that deferring the next higher assembly was not an issue. We were trying to move a flight; but I did not feel any pressure from that. Suggest relying on the TEAM concept that is put in place and ask more questions. Study the MEL's more to understand what can and cannot be done with each.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.