 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
After a beechjet flight crew landed on a closed runway 21 at fsd the event was reported to the FAA by an airport worker. Factors contributing to the event included: the flight had been offered any approach by ATC; the ATIS did not reference the closure; ATC cleared them for the approach and there were no closed markings on the runway surface.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 984251 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201112 |
| Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | FSD.Airport |
| State Reference | SD |
| Environment | |
| Light | Night |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Beechjet 400 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Landing |
| Route In Use | Vectors |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 162 Flight Crew Total 6502 Flight Crew Type 181 |
| Person 2 | |
| Function | Pilot Not Flying Captain |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument |
| Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 250 Flight Crew Total 5000 Flight Crew Type 1100 |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Deviation - Procedural FAR Ground Incursion Runway |
Narrative:
We were cleared for an ILS 21 into fsd. Shortly after receiving clearance we landed on runway 21 which was closed. We had not been advised by ATC or on ATIS. The following day we received information that an airport worker reported to the FAA that we had landed on a closed runway.1. We told center we wanted the ILS 21. Nothing was said by msp ATC about the runway being closed and we were cleared for the approach.2. No indication was on the runway that it was closed.3. We switched to advisory frequency and stated we were on the ILS 21; no ground personnel indicated that they were on the runway or that it was closed.4. There was no information on ATIS of the runway closure.5. ATC offered any approach; indicating that all runways were open.we feel there should be more warnings of runway closures. Notamed runway closures should be broadcast on ATIS. Ground personnel should have two way radio communications to enhance safety.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: After a Beechjet flight crew landed on a closed Runway 21 at FSD the event was reported to the FAA by an airport worker. Factors contributing to the event included: The flight had been offered any approach by ATC; the ATIS did not reference the closure; ATC cleared them for the approach and there were no closed markings on the runway surface.
Narrative: We were cleared for an ILS 21 into FSD. Shortly after receiving clearance we landed on Runway 21 which was closed. We had not been advised by ATC or on ATIS. The following day we received information that an airport worker reported to the FAA that we had landed on a closed runway.1. We told Center we wanted the ILS 21. Nothing was said by MSP ATC about the runway being closed and we were cleared for the approach.2. No indication was on the runway that it was closed.3. We switched to advisory frequency and stated we were on the ILS 21; no ground personnel indicated that they were on the runway or that it was closed.4. There was no information on ATIS of the runway closure.5. ATC offered any approach; indicating that all runways were open.We feel there should be more warnings of runway closures. NOTAMed runway closures should be broadcast on ATIS. Ground personnel should have two way radio communications to enhance safety.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of April 2012 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.