37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 995965 |
Time | |
Date | 201202 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Light | Dawn |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737-700 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Parked |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Fan Case |
Person 1 | |
Function | Technician |
Qualification | Maintenance Airframe Maintenance Powerplant |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
My partner and I (mechanic Y) were assigned a maintenance check [on a B737-700 aircraft]. Through normal inspection we found we needed to change two main tires and two nose tires and other various items. A third guy (mechanic Z) came over to help us. I decided to work the abradable shroud on [the] # 1 engine. Per the aircraft maintenance manual (amm); it says remove sufficient number of [fan] blades to access repair area [of abradable shroud]. I told my supervisor to pull the maintenance task [jobcard] for fan blade removal. Mechanic Z told me he could do the repair without removing fan blades. He put the putty compound in the repair area. After he was finished; he went to his airplane and I agreed to finish the repair; which involved curing the repair with heat lamps; freeing the fan blades if they were stuck and cleaning up associated mess; which I did. This process took a total of five hours. Through consultation with my lead mechanic and three other mechanics; I determined that the repair was acceptable. I later found out that the FAA decided it was not acceptable; it was not smooth enough; thus leading to an investigation. I was unaware that there was a problem with the repair until after my days off. I found out our maintenance manager pulled the airplane from service before revenue flight to correct the problem; thus leading to a fact finding meeting.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A Line Mechanic was informed the Abradable Shroud putty compound repair he and another Mechanic had applied to a CFM-56 Engine Fan Case was considered not acceptable by an FAA Inspector; the compound was not smooth enough. His Maintenance Manager pulled the B737-700 aircraft from service prior to revenue flight and corrected the problem.
Narrative: My partner and I (Mechanic Y) were assigned a Maintenance Check [on a B737-700 aircraft]. Through normal inspection we found we needed to change two main tires and two nose tires and other various items. A third guy (Mechanic Z) came over to help us. I decided to work the Abradable Shroud on [the] # 1 Engine. Per the Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM); it says remove sufficient number of [fan] blades to access repair area [of Abradable Shroud]. I told my Supervisor to pull the Maintenance Task [Jobcard] for Fan Blade Removal. Mechanic Z told me he could do the repair without removing fan blades. He put the putty compound in the repair area. After he was finished; he went to his airplane and I agreed to finish the repair; which involved curing the repair with heat lamps; freeing the fan blades if they were stuck and cleaning up associated mess; which I did. This process took a total of five hours. Through consultation with my Lead Mechanic and three other mechanics; I determined that the repair was acceptable. I later found out that the FAA decided it was not acceptable; it was not smooth enough; thus leading to an investigation. I was unaware that there was a problem with the repair until after my days off. I found out our Maintenance Manager pulled the airplane from service before revenue flight to correct the problem; thus leading to a fact finding meeting.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.