37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1047237 |
Time | |
Date | 201211 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.ARTCC |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | A300 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Cruise |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Hydraulic Main System |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Not Flying First Officer |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 90 Flight Crew Total 4200 Flight Crew Type 500 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Not Flying |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 24 Flight Crew Total 12000 Flight Crew Type 1200 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Critical |
Narrative:
We had an ECAM alert for low hydraulic fluid in the green system. We then followed all procedures. The captain made a crew coordinated decision to contact center and declare an emergency. It was made clear to them that the emergency situation would impact only approach and landing at our destination and that further enroute assistance was not needed at that time. We needed specific handling at our destination and I felt that the sooner ATC knew about it the better because it involved not being able to exit the runway; and had our situation worsened at any time; controllers would have some insight into our initial aircraft malfunction and impacts.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: An A300 ECAM alerted low Green Hydraulic System fluid so an emergency was declared enroute in order to allow the destination airport time to prepare for their arrival and being disabled on the runway.
Narrative: We had an ECAM alert for low hydraulic fluid in the Green System. We then followed all procedures. The Captain made a crew coordinated decision to contact Center and declare an emergency. It was made clear to them that the emergency situation would impact only Approach and Landing at our destination and that further enroute assistance was not needed at that time. We needed specific handling at our destination and I felt that the sooner ATC knew about it the better because it involved not being able to exit the runway; and had our situation worsened at any time; controllers would have some insight into our initial aircraft malfunction and impacts.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.