37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 106814 |
Time | |
Date | 198903 |
Day | Sat |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : btr |
State Reference | LA |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 7500 msl bound upper : 7600 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : btr |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | descent other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude cruise other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : flight engineer pilot : commercial pilot : cfi pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 16000 flight time type : 300 |
ASRS Report | 106814 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 70 flight time total : 2000 flight time type : 50 |
ASRS Report | 106716 |
Events | |
Anomaly | conflict : nmac |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : reviewed incident with flight crew |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 0 vertical : 100 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Narrative:
While descending into btr at approximately 8500' on the btr 290 degrees/20 DME traffic small aircraft was called out at 11 O'clock and 5 mi. We were called out to small aircraft at the same time. We acknowledged that we did not see him, however he responded that he had visibility contact with us. We had all available lights on. Approximately 1 1/2 mins later small aircraft stated he would level at 7500'. We continued to look for him and then suddenly at 12 O'clock to our position heading directly at us at 1/8 of a mi he appeared. I pulled back on my elevator to stop my descent at 7600'. Small aircraft passed below me at no more than 100' vertical sep and 0' horizontal sep. This event took no more than 3 seconds. I contacted the supervisor on duty at baton rouge approach control and initiated appropriate near miss report procedures. This problem arose out of a belief upon the part of the supervisor on duty in the btr approach control that less than required sep between converging aircraft can occur if one of the aircraft has visibility contact with the other. This procedure or philosophy is fatally flawed and will result in future tragedy. If 2 aircraft are on a collision course one or both aircraft whether IFR or VFR need to be issued avoidance vectors in all situations. Total tragedy was averted in this situation due to a last split second visibility sighting. We may not be so fortunate if this situation occurs again.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: CLOSE PROX ACR-MLG GA-SMA.
Narrative: WHILE DSNDING INTO BTR AT APPROX 8500' ON THE BTR 290 DEGS/20 DME TFC SMA WAS CALLED OUT AT 11 O'CLOCK AND 5 MI. WE WERE CALLED OUT TO SMA AT THE SAME TIME. WE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT WE DID NOT SEE HIM, HOWEVER HE RESPONDED THAT HE HAD VIS CONTACT WITH US. WE HAD ALL AVAILABLE LIGHTS ON. APPROX 1 1/2 MINS LATER SMA STATED HE WOULD LEVEL AT 7500'. WE CONTINUED TO LOOK FOR HIM AND THEN SUDDENLY AT 12 O'CLOCK TO OUR POS HDG DIRECTLY AT US AT 1/8 OF A MI HE APPEARED. I PULLED BACK ON MY ELEVATOR TO STOP MY DSCNT AT 7600'. SMA PASSED BELOW ME AT NO MORE THAN 100' VERT SEP AND 0' HORIZ SEP. THIS EVENT TOOK NO MORE THAN 3 SECS. I CONTACTED THE SUPVR ON DUTY AT BATON ROUGE APCH CTL AND INITIATED APPROPRIATE NEAR MISS RPT PROCS. THIS PROB AROSE OUT OF A BELIEF UPON THE PART OF THE SUPVR ON DUTY IN THE BTR APCH CTL THAT LESS THAN REQUIRED SEP BTWN CONVERGING ACFT CAN OCCUR IF ONE OF THE ACFT HAS VIS CONTACT WITH THE OTHER. THIS PROC OR PHILOSOPHY IS FATALLY FLAWED AND WILL RESULT IN FUTURE TRAGEDY. IF 2 ACFT ARE ON A COLLISION COURSE ONE OR BOTH ACFT WHETHER IFR OR VFR NEED TO BE ISSUED AVOIDANCE VECTORS IN ALL SITUATIONS. TOTAL TRAGEDY WAS AVERTED IN THIS SITUATION DUE TO A LAST SPLIT SECOND VIS SIGHTING. WE MAY NOT BE SO FORTUNATE IF THIS SITUATION OCCURS AGAIN.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.