37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1101592 |
Time | |
Date | 201307 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | No Aircraft |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Electronic Flt Bag (EFB) |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
During simulator training we used several denver approach plates on the ipad for landing. Some of the approach plate layouts had changed to a 2 page format in the ipad. While this may seem like a minor issue; it caused problems. The issue is that the approach minimums and effective date are on a different page from the plan and profile views. This is fine while briefing the approach; but not good when flying the approach. All previous commercial 1 charts have had all this information on the same page ensuring quick reference while in flight. Checking the minimums while on final; normally takes a glance; but with this two page system; becomes a challenge. One must swipe to the earlier page; then back to the profile page. If the 'swipe' is too vigorous; you see another chart entirely. This requires 'swiping' forward to the needed chart. This is a lousy time to have to deal with this type of detail. The profile; plan and minimums info needs to be on the same page! I was late making a minimums call because of the scenario described above.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: During a simulator session; a Captain noted an iPad two page PLAN and PROFILE approach plate had the EFF Date and approach MIN on a different page which required scrolling between pages during the brief or at a critical time on the approach.
Narrative: During simulator training we used several Denver approach plates on the iPad for landing. Some of the approach plate layouts had changed to a 2 page format in the iPad. While this may seem like a minor issue; it caused problems. The issue is that the approach minimums and effective date are on a different page from the plan and profile views. This is fine while briefing the approach; but not good when flying the approach. All previous Commercial 1 charts have had all this information on the same page ensuring quick reference while in flight. Checking the minimums while on final; normally takes a glance; but with this two page system; becomes a challenge. One must swipe to the earlier page; then back to the profile page. If the 'swipe' is too vigorous; you see another chart entirely. This requires 'swiping' forward to the needed chart. This is a lousy time to have to deal with this type of detail. The profile; plan and minimums info needs to be on the same page! I was late making a minimums call because of the scenario described above.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2013 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.