Narrative:

We were being vectored for the visibility to 9L to follow an mdt which we had in sight. After a base heading of 180 degrees we were issued a turn to 120 degrees to intercept 9L and were advised of traffic a 12 O'clock on the parallel to 9R. We had this traffic on medium large transport in sight at our altitude. We had to use bank angles up to 45 degrees and even that put us through 9L and onto 9R centerline, as he was directly behind us. It was obvious we were very close. We were not cleared for the visibility until after we were issued the heading to intercept 9L. We also had been level at 7000' on the downwind leg and were issued a clearance to 3000'. We should not be given crossing or same altitudes when being vectored for visibility parallel approachs until securely established on appropriate runway centerline.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: NMAC BETWEEN ACFT ON APCH TO PARALLEL RWYS.

Narrative: WE WERE BEING VECTORED FOR THE VIS TO 9L TO FOLLOW AN MDT WHICH WE HAD IN SIGHT. AFTER A BASE HDG OF 180 DEGS WE WERE ISSUED A TURN TO 120 DEGS TO INTERCEPT 9L AND WERE ADVISED OF TFC A 12 O'CLOCK ON THE PARALLEL TO 9R. WE HAD THIS TFC ON MLG IN SIGHT AT OUR ALT. WE HAD TO USE BANK ANGLES UP TO 45 DEGS AND EVEN THAT PUT US THROUGH 9L AND ONTO 9R CENTERLINE, AS HE WAS DIRECTLY BEHIND US. IT WAS OBVIOUS WE WERE VERY CLOSE. WE WERE NOT CLRED FOR THE VIS UNTIL AFTER WE WERE ISSUED THE HDG TO INTERCEPT 9L. WE ALSO HAD BEEN LEVEL AT 7000' ON THE DOWNWIND LEG AND WERE ISSUED A CLRNC TO 3000'. WE SHOULD NOT BE GIVEN XING OR SAME ALTS WHEN BEING VECTORED FOR VIS PARALLEL APCHS UNTIL SECURELY ESTABLISHED ON APPROPRIATE RWY CENTERLINE.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.