37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 114289 |
Time | |
Date | 198906 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0001 To 0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : las |
State Reference | NV |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zla |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | climbout : intermediate altitude cruise other cruise other |
Route In Use | departure sid : sid |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi pilot : flight engineer |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 200 flight time total : 18000 flight time type : 1000 |
ASRS Report | 114289 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | non adherence : clearance other anomaly other other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
What I believed caused the problem is the way in which the flight plan is printed. If put in the FMC as printed it is not current when there is a transition involved as the computer generated flight plan shows aveto 8. Dvc awd does not say dvc transition therefore the FMC when programmed as per the flight plan terminates the aveto 8 at aveto and proceeds to dvc and not via the transition when it is programmed in to the computer just as stated on the computer generated IFR flight plan. I feel this problem could be avoided if the computer generated flight plan showed aveto 8 dvc transition, then the filed routing and FMC routing would agree.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: DEVIATION FROM ROUTE OF SID TRANSITION. HEADING AND TRACK DEVIATION.
Narrative: WHAT I BELIEVED CAUSED THE PROBLEM IS THE WAY IN WHICH THE FLT PLAN IS PRINTED. IF PUT IN THE FMC AS PRINTED IT IS NOT CURRENT WHEN THERE IS A TRANSITION INVOLVED AS THE COMPUTER GENERATED FLT PLAN SHOWS AVETO 8. DVC AWD DOES NOT SAY DVC TRANSITION THEREFORE THE FMC WHEN PROGRAMMED AS PER THE FLT PLAN TERMINATES THE AVETO 8 AT AVETO AND PROCEEDS TO DVC AND NOT VIA THE TRANSITION WHEN IT IS PROGRAMMED IN TO THE COMPUTER JUST AS STATED ON THE COMPUTER GENERATED IFR FLT PLAN. I FEEL THIS PROBLEM COULD BE AVOIDED IF THE COMPUTER GENERATED FLT PLAN SHOWED AVETO 8 DVC TRANSITION, THEN THE FILED ROUTING AND FMC ROUTING WOULD AGREE.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.