37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1153631 |
Time | |
Date | 201402 |
Local Time Of Day | 0601-1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | MD-83 |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Horizontal Stabilizer Trim |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe |
Narrative:
As we were on our takeoff roll; at just under 90 knots; we received a 'stabilizer' CAWS aural warning. I pulled the power to idle to reject the takeoff and as we exited the runway tower asked if we required assistance. My first officer responded that no assistance was required and we would like to exit the runway onto taxiway bravo to ascertain our situation. I called dispatch who conferenced with maintenance control. Together we determined it had been a high speed abort (i.e. Above 80 knots) and we were required to return to the gate.this exact same CAWS warning occurred three days before with this aircraft. The logbook indicated that it happened at 120 knots and that they continued the takeoff. Of course; it would have been great to have resolved it after it happened the first time.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: The flight crew of an MD-83 rejected their takeoff at 90 knots due to a CAWS stabilizer warning.
Narrative: As we were on our takeoff roll; at just under 90 knots; we received a 'stabilizer' CAWS aural warning. I pulled the power to idle to reject the takeoff and as we exited the runway Tower asked if we required assistance. My First Officer responded that no assistance was required and we would like to exit the runway onto taxiway bravo to ascertain our situation. I called Dispatch who conferenced with Maintenance Control. Together we determined it had been a high speed abort (i.e. above 80 knots) and we were required to return to the gate.This exact same CAWS warning occurred three days before with this aircraft. The logbook indicated that it happened at 120 knots and that they continued the takeoff. Of course; it would have been great to have resolved it after it happened the first time.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.