37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1181406 |
Time | |
Date | 201406 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ATL.Airport |
State Reference | GA |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Regional Jet 200 ER/LR (CRJ200) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | B717 (Formerly MD-95) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Other / Unknown |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 9 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Track / Heading All Types Inflight Event / Encounter Wake Vortex Encounter |
Narrative:
Aircraft X (a crj); a runway 26L departure; advised that he was deviating left of course for wake turbulence. This conflicted with aircraft Y (a B717); a runway 27R departure. I told aircraft X unable left deviation due to traffic and approved a deviation right of course. I informed aircraft X that he was 6 miles behind a B757. Aircraft X stated he wanted to try to get out of the wake turbulence and said he got a 90 degree roll. I issued a 3-1-0 heading to aircraft X to ensure separation with aircraft Y and provide diverging course from the wake turbulence from aircraft Z (the 757). The pilot of aircraft Z inquired on the frequency if that wake turbulence was from him and wanted to verify the 90 degree aspect also. I alerted the watch supervisor.this may be connected with recat; however without analyzing the data; I am not sure that wake turbulence separation wasn't even provided under the old standard.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Support Specialist at A80 reports of aircraft entering wake turbulence and asking for a vector to the left. Controller cannot issue a left heading due to traffic; and issues a right turn.
Narrative: Aircraft X (a CRJ); a Runway 26L departure; advised that he was deviating left of course for wake turbulence. This conflicted with Aircraft Y (a B717); a Runway 27R departure. I told Aircraft X unable left deviation due to traffic and approved a deviation right of course. I informed Aircraft X that he was 6 miles behind a B757. Aircraft X stated he wanted to try to get out of the wake turbulence and said he got a 90 degree roll. I issued a 3-1-0 heading to Aircraft X to ensure separation with Aircraft Y and provide diverging course from the wake turbulence from Aircraft Z (the 757). The pilot of Aircraft Z inquired on the frequency if that wake turbulence was from him and wanted to verify the 90 degree aspect also. I alerted the Watch Supervisor.This may be connected with RECAT; however without analyzing the data; I am not sure that wake turbulence separation wasn't even provided under the old standard.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.