Narrative:

I was busy working the rdu rush and was involved with a complex control problem just south of roa, when my left side controller pointed out a potential system error in the vicinity of rnl. Small transport X was descending to 7000 swbnd and small transport Y was at 9000 eastbound. Small transport X was leaving 9800 and I knew I could not get him back up to 10,000 in time. I turned small transport X to a 180 degree heading and requested he expedite his descent. I also turned small transport Y north. Apparently when I turned small transport X south, I issued a right turn (300 degree). The aircraft passed with about 1 mile and 6 hundred feet. A left turn to 180 degree would probably have resulted in approved separation.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: AN SMT WAS INADVERTENTLY ISSUED A DESCENT THAT CONFLICTED WITH OPPOSITE DIRECTION TRAFFIC RESULTING IN LESS THAN STANDARD SEPARATION.

Narrative: I WAS BUSY WORKING THE RDU RUSH AND WAS INVOLVED WITH A COMPLEX CTL PROBLEM JUST SOUTH OF ROA, WHEN MY LEFT SIDE CTLR POINTED OUT A POTENTIAL SYSTEM ERROR IN THE VICINITY OF RNL. SMT X WAS DESCENDING TO 7000 SWBND AND SMT Y WAS AT 9000 EBND. SMT X WAS LEAVING 9800 AND I KNEW I COULD NOT GET HIM BACK UP TO 10,000 IN TIME. I TURNED SMT X TO A 180 DEG HDG AND REQUESTED HE EXPEDITE HIS DSCNT. I ALSO TURNED SMT Y NORTH. APPARENTLY WHEN I TURNED SMT X SOUTH, I ISSUED A RIGHT TURN (300 DEG). THE ACFT PASSED WITH ABOUT 1 MILE AND 6 HUNDRED FEET. A LEFT TURN TO 180 DEG WOULD PROBABLY HAVE RESULTED IN APPROVED SEPARATION.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.