37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 119741 |
Time | |
Date | 198908 |
Day | Thu |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : pvd |
State Reference | RI |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 8000 msl bound upper : 8000 |
Environment | |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | tracon : bdl |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Transport |
Navigation In Use | Other |
Flight Phase | cruise other cruise other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 179 flight time total : 3523 |
ASRS Report | 119741 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : clearance other spatial deviation |
Independent Detector | other controllera other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | controller : issued new clearance flight crew : returned to intended course or assigned course other |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
Shortly after departing pvd we were given direct hfd. Since we were below 10,000' AGL and further than 40 mi, I programmed an RNAV fix for hfd off of pvd VOR (279 degree radial for 51 miles). It is also well known that hfd VOR waivers and scallops quite a bit so RNAV is more accurate to use when navigating to hfd. The first officer had hfd tuned in on his side raw data. About 30 mi from hfd I noticed a slight discrepancy between my bearing pointer to the station and the first officer's. At 25 mi from hfd, I switched the RNAV off and used hfd VOR. There was a 30 degree discrepancy between RNAV and raw data. After double-checking with the first officer and identifying hfd, we agreed the RNAV was wrong and made a 30 degree correction to the left. 3 mins later bradley approach control gave us a 30 degree left heading and asked if we had been navigating direct to hfd. We explained about the RNAV failure and continued to hfd. Upon reaching la guardia, an internal test of the RNAV showed it had failed and I rendered it inoperative in the aircraft logbook (a preflight test earlier that morning had showed it to operate normally).
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TRACK DEVIATION.
Narrative: SHORTLY AFTER DEPARTING PVD WE WERE GIVEN DIRECT HFD. SINCE WE WERE BELOW 10,000' AGL AND FURTHER THAN 40 MI, I PROGRAMMED AN RNAV FIX FOR HFD OFF OF PVD VOR (279 DEG RADIAL FOR 51 MILES). IT IS ALSO WELL KNOWN THAT HFD VOR WAIVERS AND SCALLOPS QUITE A BIT SO RNAV IS MORE ACCURATE TO USE WHEN NAVIGATING TO HFD. THE F/O HAD HFD TUNED IN ON HIS SIDE RAW DATA. ABOUT 30 MI FROM HFD I NOTICED A SLIGHT DISCREPANCY BETWEEN MY BEARING POINTER TO THE STATION AND THE F/O'S. AT 25 MI FROM HFD, I SWITCHED THE RNAV OFF AND USED HFD VOR. THERE WAS A 30 DEG DISCREPANCY BETWEEN RNAV AND RAW DATA. AFTER DOUBLE-CHECKING WITH THE F/O AND IDENTIFYING HFD, WE AGREED THE RNAV WAS WRONG AND MADE A 30 DEG CORRECTION TO THE LEFT. 3 MINS LATER BRADLEY APCH CTL GAVE US A 30 DEG LEFT HDG AND ASKED IF WE HAD BEEN NAVIGATING DIRECT TO HFD. WE EXPLAINED ABOUT THE RNAV FAILURE AND CONTINUED TO HFD. UPON REACHING LA GUARDIA, AN INTERNAL TEST OF THE RNAV SHOWED IT HAD FAILED AND I RENDERED IT INOPERATIVE IN THE ACFT LOGBOOK (A PREFLT TEST EARLIER THAT MORNING HAD SHOWED IT TO OPERATE NORMALLY).
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.