37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1199282 |
Time | |
Date | 201408 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZNY.ARTCC |
State Reference | NY |
Environment | |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Climb |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Enroute |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Fully Certified |
Experience | Air Traffic Control Time Certified In Pos 1 (yrs) 4 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Conflict Airborne Conflict Deviation - Altitude Excursion From Assigned Altitude Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Procedural Clearance |
Narrative:
Aircraft X and aircraft Y departed via rbv.J230. I climbed aircraft X to FL280. Read back was unclear; and the frequency was blocked. I believed that aircraft Y was making his initial check-in; but see he had already started to climb; so again I climb aircraft X to FL280. I continue my scan and see that aircraft Z departing lga to cyyz via newel was climbing at FL185 and was flashing with a lendy arrival from area C sector 36. I call N90 and see if they were climbing this aircraft. They informed me that no and that he had been switched to my frequency. I then descend aircraft Z to 170 expedite for traffic. I call sector 36; and advise him that I am descending my aircraft and that he must have taken another aircrafts instructions. The sector 36 controller turned his aircraft to the left to avoid aircraft Z and stopped his descent. I did not recall the aircraft Z checking on; but there must have been some frequency congestion and blocking and the wrong aircraft took the wrong instructions. First; there were many distractions for a good time before this incident. There were many deviations by rbv and the N90 controller had to continuously call to coordinate deviations. Also; similar sounding call signs were a factor. Frequency congestion for deviations and also landline congestions for the extraneous coordination; it is sometimes difficult to keep the aircraft from blocking the check in. If there are that many deviations; an in-trail restriction should go into place. Companies should refrain from using call signs so similar because it causes unnecessary confusion.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ZNY Controller reports of similar sounding call signs causing confusion and pilots taking the others clearances.
Narrative: Aircraft X and Aircraft Y departed via RBV.J230. I climbed Aircraft X to FL280. Read back was unclear; and the frequency was blocked. I believed that Aircraft Y was making his initial check-in; but see he had already started to climb; so again I climb Aircraft X to FL280. I continue my scan and see that Aircraft Z departing LGA to CYYZ via Newel was climbing at FL185 and was flashing with a Lendy arrival from Area C sector 36. I call N90 and see if they were climbing this aircraft. They informed me that no and that he had been switched to my frequency. I then descend Aircraft Z to 170 expedite for traffic. I call sector 36; and advise him that I am descending my aircraft and that he must have taken another aircrafts instructions. The sector 36 controller turned his aircraft to the left to avoid Aircraft Z and stopped his descent. I did not recall the Aircraft Z checking on; but there must have been some frequency congestion and blocking and the wrong aircraft took the wrong instructions. First; there were many distractions for a good time before this incident. There were many deviations by RBV and the N90 controller had to continuously call to coordinate deviations. Also; similar sounding call signs were a factor. Frequency congestion for deviations and also landline congestions for the extraneous coordination; it is sometimes difficult to keep the aircraft from blocking the check in. If there are that many deviations; an in-trail restriction should go into place. Companies should refrain from using call signs so similar because it causes unnecessary confusion.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.