Narrative:

While cruising on an IFR flight plan at 6000' MSL, I encountered moderate turbulence and strong updrafts while IMC in cumulus buildups. I called rfd approach several times in order to inform the controller of the conditions and obtain relief in the form of a block altitude of 6000-7000', as it was not possible to maintain the assigned level. On at least 2 occasions, the response was 'standby.' when a response was ultimately elicited, and the controller was advised of conditions, he finally noticed the mode C readout increasing at 6500' and responded with an extended lecture on the regulatory requirements of maintaining assigned altitude. When reminded that he'd been called for several minutes, the answer was, 'I was busy.' since at the time the light aircraft was being buffeted by updrafts, that answer was not very helpful. I had my hands full maintaining altitude west/O overstressing the airframe. There needs to be more attention paid to controller attitude concerning attention to the problem in process and less to the controller's ego.

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: CPR SMA ALT DEVIATION EXCURSION FROM CLRNC ALT IN TURBULENCE.

Narrative: WHILE CRUISING ON AN IFR FLT PLAN AT 6000' MSL, I ENCOUNTERED MODERATE TURB AND STRONG UPDRAFTS WHILE IMC IN CUMULUS BUILDUPS. I CALLED RFD APCH SEVERAL TIMES IN ORDER TO INFORM THE CTLR OF THE CONDITIONS AND OBTAIN RELIEF IN THE FORM OF A BLOCK ALT OF 6000-7000', AS IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO MAINTAIN THE ASSIGNED LEVEL. ON AT LEAST 2 OCCASIONS, THE RESPONSE WAS 'STANDBY.' WHEN A RESPONSE WAS ULTIMATELY ELICITED, AND THE CTLR WAS ADVISED OF CONDITIONS, HE FINALLY NOTICED THE MODE C READOUT INCREASING AT 6500' AND RESPONDED WITH AN EXTENDED LECTURE ON THE REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS OF MAINTAINING ASSIGNED ALT. WHEN REMINDED THAT HE'D BEEN CALLED FOR SEVERAL MINUTES, THE ANSWER WAS, 'I WAS BUSY.' SINCE AT THE TIME THE LIGHT ACFT WAS BEING BUFFETED BY UPDRAFTS, THAT ANSWER WAS NOT VERY HELPFUL. I HAD MY HANDS FULL MAINTAINING ALT W/O OVERSTRESSING THE AIRFRAME. THERE NEEDS TO BE MORE ATTN PAID TO CTLR ATTITUDE CONCERNING ATTN TO THE PROB IN PROCESS AND LESS TO THE CTLR'S EGO.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.