37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 122950 |
Time | |
Date | 198909 |
Day | Wed |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : rsw |
State Reference | FL |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Large Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turbojet Eng |
Flight Phase | ground : preflight |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 270 flight time total : 9000 flight time type : 7000 |
ASRS Report | 122950 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Events | |
Anomaly | aircraft equipment problem : less severe non adherence : far |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | none taken : anomaly accepted |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Aircraft |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
At rsw, outer pane of first officer window cracked while aircraft was parked at gate. Maintenance called and inspected window. Verified that only outer pane was cracked and that structural integrity of window was not effected. Crack did not obstruct first officer line of vision. Maintenance and dispatch said I could go with MEL for window heat inoperative. I flew at 25000' and airspeed at 250 KTS. In retrospect, I feel I was not legal to go since MEL did not specifically address a cracked windshield.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: ACR MLG DEPARTED ON SCHEDULED PASSENGER FLT WITH FO'S WINDSHIELD CRACKED. MAINTENANCE HAD VERIFIED THAT IT WAS ONLY THE OUTER PANE AND MINIMUM EQUIPMENT LIST RESTRICTIONS WERE COMPLIED WITH.
Narrative: AT RSW, OUTER PANE OF F/O WINDOW CRACKED WHILE ACFT WAS PARKED AT GATE. MAINT CALLED AND INSPECTED WINDOW. VERIFIED THAT ONLY OUTER PANE WAS CRACKED AND THAT STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF WINDOW WAS NOT EFFECTED. CRACK DID NOT OBSTRUCT F/O LINE OF VISION. MAINT AND DISPATCH SAID I COULD GO WITH MEL FOR WINDOW HEAT INOP. I FLEW AT 25000' AND AIRSPD AT 250 KTS. IN RETROSPECT, I FEEL I WAS NOT LEGAL TO GO SINCE MEL DID NOT SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS A CRACKED WINDSHIELD.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of August 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.