37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1317465 |
Time | |
Date | 201512 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | LAS.Airport |
State Reference | NV |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Component | |
Aircraft Component | Tablet |
Person 1 | |
Function | Captain |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 160 |
Person 2 | |
Function | First Officer |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 168 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Deviation - Speed All Types |
Narrative:
On flight from las; it felt like our takeoff v-speed was set low. Performance computer was MEL'd; so we were using ACARS to calculate our takeoff performance. The ATIS was calling for LLWS so we used max power; flaps 5 and a higher rotation speed. The passenger load was light with a fuel load for a three and a half-hour flight. When we did the before push checklist it was cumbersome to check the takeoff performance using the ACARS method. We tried to keep one FMC on the ACARS page and the other on the takeoff performance page. There are a lot of page changes on both FMC to complete the before push checklist. I remember checking the weight and balance sheet against the takeoff performance page; but cannot remember checking the weight on the ACARS page. (It is easy to check the performance numbers on the performance computer because you are holding the computer and the numbers are in the correct order.) on takeoff; acceleration was good because of the max power takeoff. I felt the V1; vr; and V2 were low; but climb performance was good; again because of the max power takeoff.what would help in preventing this for occurring again is put the ACARS takeoff performance page in the same order as the before push checklist and on a single page. That way you don't have page back and forth to find information to complete the checklist.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Due to an inoperative performance computer; crew relied on ACARS takeoff performance data. Crew believed that the ACARS performance data generated incorrect V-speeds for takeoff. The crew was using max power because of LLWS at the airport. As a result; the takeoff was uneventful.
Narrative: On flight from LAS; it felt like our takeoff V-speed was set low. Performance computer was MEL'd; so we were using ACARS to calculate our takeoff performance. The ATIS was calling for LLWS so we used max power; flaps 5 and a higher rotation speed. The Passenger load was light with a fuel load for a three and a half-hour flight. When we did the Before Push Checklist it was cumbersome to check the takeoff performance using the ACARS method. We tried to keep one FMC on the ACARS page and the other on the Takeoff Performance page. There are a lot of page changes on both FMC to complete the Before Push Checklist. I remember checking the weight and balance sheet against the Takeoff Performance page; but cannot remember checking the weight on the ACARS page. (It is easy to check the performance numbers on the performance computer because you are holding the computer and the numbers are in the correct order.) On takeoff; acceleration was good because of the max power takeoff. I felt the V1; VR; and V2 were low; but climb performance was good; again because of the max power takeoff.What would help in preventing this for occurring again is put the ACARS Takeoff Performance page in the same order as the Before Push Checklist and on a single page. That way you don't have page back and forth to find information to complete the checklist.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.