37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1432779 |
Time | |
Date | 201703 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | LAN.Airport |
State Reference | MI |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Night |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Widebody Transport |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Final Approach |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 75 Flight Crew Total 7500 Flight Crew Type 2500 |
Person 2 | |
Function | Captain Pilot Flying |
Qualification | Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 85 Flight Crew Total 18250 Flight Crew Type 9500 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy Inflight Event / Encounter CFTT / CFIT |
Narrative:
I was the pilot monitoring (pm) on this flight to lan. We were flying a visual approach to 28L. There are a couple of towers south of the final approach course that must be avoided--we had discussed these towers earlier in the evening as well as previously in the week. The captain (pilot flying) was descending to 2;400 feet on a base leg that would intercept the final approach course a mile or two outside of burye. We could see all the towers; and we were just above and just to the west of the 1878 feet tower. We were either in a very shallow vs descent or had gotten altitude cap when the egpws caution sounded. This was followed almost immediately by the egpws warning (obstacle; obstacle; pull up). The PF disconnected the automation and began a climb. We were clear of the obstacle right away and we were able to fly a normal; stable approach and land without further incident. I suspect that the cold temperature may have been a factor in this incident. Had we calculated the temperature induced altimeter error we probably would have found that we did not have as much vertical clearance as we thought we did.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Air carrier flight crew on a visual approach to LAN reported receiving an EGPWS aural Pull-Up warning.
Narrative: I was the Pilot Monitoring (PM) on this flight to LAN. We were flying a visual approach to 28L. There are a couple of towers south of the final approach course that must be avoided--we had discussed these towers earlier in the evening as well as previously in the week. The Captain (Pilot Flying) was descending to 2;400 feet on a base leg that would intercept the final approach course a mile or two outside of BURYE. We could see all the towers; and we were just above and just to the west of the 1878 feet tower. We were either in a very shallow VS descent or had gotten ALT CAP when the EGPWS caution sounded. This was followed almost immediately by the EGPWS warning (Obstacle; Obstacle; Pull Up). The PF disconnected the automation and began a climb. We were clear of the obstacle right away and we were able to fly a normal; stable approach and land without further incident. I suspect that the cold temperature may have been a factor in this incident. Had we calculated the temperature induced altimeter error we probably would have found that we did not have as much vertical clearance as we thought we did.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.