37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 145872 |
Time | |
Date | 199005 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 1201 To 1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : cgx |
State Reference | IL |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | other |
Make Model Name | Small Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | landing other |
Flight Plan | VFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | government other |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp pilot : cfi |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 150 flight time total : 9500 flight time type : 2400 |
ASRS Report | 145872 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | government other |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Events | |
Anomaly | incursion : runway other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other controllera |
Resolutory Action | none taken : detected after the fact |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | Pilot Deviation |
Narrative:
We were on an IFR flight plan from pwk to mdw with a further destination of chx. The actual WX wa clear and visibility was excellent. We were being vectored way out of our way over lake michigan and I could see the trip was going to take twice as long as necessary. Since we were only about 10 mi from cgx and were there for a drop-off after mdw, I thought it made more sense to cancel IFR,land at cgx and then go VFR to mdw. We cancelled IFR with approach and called cgx tower. We were told to report the pier (which is about 5 NM north of the field). Cgx is a lake-front airport with a 18/36 runway. We called the reporting point and were cleared to land. Upon rollout and just before turning off the runway, the tower informed us we landed on the wrong runway. We had not checked ATIS and I don't believe the tower gave us winds, but they had been westerly. Now I did notice a slight tailwind on rollout, but no real problem. The winds were 290 degrees, 10 KTS, but 270 degrees about 5 mins later. We should have checked ATIS and/or at least asked for a wind check or confirmed landing runway.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: FLT CREW OF GOVT ACFT LANDED WRONG DIRECTION.
Narrative: WE WERE ON AN IFR FLT PLAN FROM PWK TO MDW WITH A FURTHER DEST OF CHX. THE ACTUAL WX WA CLR AND VISIBILITY WAS EXCELLENT. WE WERE BEING VECTORED WAY OUT OF OUR WAY OVER LAKE MICHIGAN AND I COULD SEE THE TRIP WAS GOING TO TAKE TWICE AS LONG AS NECESSARY. SINCE WE WERE ONLY ABOUT 10 MI FROM CGX AND WERE THERE FOR A DROP-OFF AFTER MDW, I THOUGHT IT MADE MORE SENSE TO CANCEL IFR,LAND AT CGX AND THEN GO VFR TO MDW. WE CANCELLED IFR WITH APCH AND CALLED CGX TWR. WE WERE TOLD TO RPT THE PIER (WHICH IS ABOUT 5 NM N OF THE FIELD). CGX IS A LAKE-FRONT ARPT WITH A 18/36 RWY. WE CALLED THE RPTING POINT AND WERE CLRED TO LAND. UPON ROLLOUT AND JUST BEFORE TURNING OFF THE RWY, THE TWR INFORMED US WE LANDED ON THE WRONG RWY. WE HAD NOT CHKED ATIS AND I DON'T BELIEVE THE TWR GAVE US WINDS, BUT THEY HAD BEEN WESTERLY. NOW I DID NOTICE A SLIGHT TAILWIND ON ROLLOUT, BUT NO REAL PROB. THE WINDS WERE 290 DEGS, 10 KTS, BUT 270 DEGS ABOUT 5 MINS LATER. WE SHOULD HAVE CHKED ATIS AND/OR AT LEAST ASKED FOR A WIND CHK OR CONFIRMED LNDG RWY.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.