 |
37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
A gulfstream first officer reported they received a traffic advisory on base leg and a resolution advisory during final approach.
| Attributes | |
| ACN | 1487329 |
| Time | |
| Date | 201710 |
| Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
| Place | |
| Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
| State Reference | US |
| Environment | |
| Flight Conditions | VMC |
| Light | Daylight |
| Aircraft 1 | |
| Make Model Name | Gulfstream G280 |
| Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
| Flight Phase | Final Approach |
| Route In Use | Visual Approach |
| Flight Plan | IFR |
| Aircraft 2 | |
| Make Model Name | Mustang (P51) |
| Flight Phase | Final Approach |
| Route In Use | Visual Approach |
| Person 1 | |
| Function | First Officer Pilot Not Flying |
| Qualification | Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Air Transport Pilot (ATP) |
| Events | |
| Anomaly | Conflict NMAC |
| Miss Distance | Horizontal 250 Vertical 150 |
Narrative:
We were cleared number 1 for the visual approach runway 03R and the P-51 was cleared number 2 on the visual and called us insight. While on the base leg of our approach we received a TA to 'monitor vertical speed' for traffic below us identified as the P51. While making our turn from base to final we received an RA to climb. I was sitting right seat and looked back at the 4-5 O'clock position and noticed the P-51 climbing over our tail and immediately instructed the pilot flying not to climb because the traffic was overtaking us from above at a high closure rate and extremely close distance.the pilot in the other aircraft had a strong lack of acknowledging and following ATC instructions (including airspeed reductions; and position reports) as evident from the ATC live recordings of the event. We reported the RA to the tower controller and landed safely. I have contacted the tower and started a complaint with the supervisor. In our perception of the event; the tower controller offered adequate reports and instructions to both aircraft but the event arose due to the negligence of the other aircraft.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: A Gulfstream First Officer reported they received a Traffic Advisory on base leg and a Resolution Advisory during final approach.
Narrative: We were cleared number 1 for the visual approach RWY 03R and the P-51 was cleared number 2 on the visual and called us insight. While on the base leg of our approach we received a TA to 'monitor vertical speed' for traffic below us identified as the P51. While making our turn from base to final we received an RA to CLIMB. I was sitting right seat and looked back at the 4-5 O'clock position and noticed the P-51 climbing over our tail and immediately instructed the pilot flying not to climb because the traffic was overtaking us from above at a high closure rate and extremely close distance.The Pilot in the other aircraft had a strong lack of acknowledging and following ATC instructions (including airspeed reductions; and position reports) as evident from the ATC live recordings of the event. We reported the RA to the tower controller and landed safely. I have contacted the tower and started a complaint with the supervisor. In our perception of the event; the tower controller offered adequate reports and instructions to both aircraft but the event arose due to the negligence of the other aircraft.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.