37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1531209 |
Time | |
Date | 201804 |
Local Time Of Day | 1201-1800 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | DA20 Undifferentiated |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Initial Climb |
Route In Use | Visual Approach |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | Medium Transport Low Wing 2 Turbojet Eng |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Qualification | Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Instrument Flight Crew Multiengine |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 122 Flight Crew Total 1235 Flight Crew Type 349 |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Ground Conflict Critical |
Narrative:
I was conducting an evaluation flight for one of our students at the time. The student was attempting to land on runway 32 at ZZZ which resulted in a bounce and subsequent go around. As the student was initiating the go around tower cleared a regional for takeoff on runway 23L. I immediately announced that we were on the go on runway 32. I believe that my transmission was blocked by the regional repeating their takeoff clearance so I announced again that we were on the go. The tower controller told us to stop which I replied that I could not stop because we were doing a go around. The takeoff clearance for the regional was cancelled by the tower controller and we were instructed to enter left traffic for 23L and then changed to 23R later. Reaching approximately 400 feet AGL and just shy of 23L we turned upwind for 23L to enter the traffic pattern and landed uneventfully on 23R.on the ground I called the tower phone number about the situation. He explained that the tower controller thought we were conducting a touch and go when instead of a go around when he initially told us to stop and that once he was aware we were executing a go around the situation was handled properly. There are a few things about this that concern me. If a pilot who was executing a go around as a result of a bounced landing responded and complied to the stop command by trying to land again on the runway this would likely result in damage to the airplane and a runway overrun. Both situations which we do not want to happen. The airplane I was flying today had the performance to reach altitude and turn safely before crossing 23L. However depending on the atmospheric conditions; the type of airplane and its weight we will not always be able to turn prior to the runway without increasing the risk of a stall/spin accident to an unacceptable level. This may lead to additional hazards and possibly a near collision with an aircraft taking off or landing on the perpendicular runways.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: DA20 flight instructor reported a conflict during a go-around when ATC cleared a regional aircraft to takeoff from a crossing runway.
Narrative: I was conducting an evaluation flight for one of our students at the time. The student was attempting to land on Runway 32 at ZZZ which resulted in a bounce and subsequent go around. As the student was initiating the go around Tower cleared a regional for takeoff on runway 23L. I immediately announced that we were on the go on runway 32. I believe that my transmission was blocked by the regional repeating their takeoff clearance so I announced again that we were on the go. The tower controller told us to stop which I replied that I could not stop because we were doing a go around. The takeoff clearance for the regional was cancelled by the tower controller and we were instructed to enter left traffic for 23L and then changed to 23R later. Reaching approximately 400 feet AGL and just shy of 23L we turned upwind for 23L to enter the traffic pattern and landed uneventfully on 23R.On the ground I called the tower phone number about the situation. He explained that the tower controller thought we were conducting a touch and go when instead of a go around when he initially told us to stop and that once he was aware we were executing a go around the situation was handled properly. There are a few things about this that concern me. If a pilot who was executing a go around as a result of a bounced landing responded and complied to the stop command by trying to land again on the runway this would likely result in damage to the airplane and a runway overrun. Both situations which we do not want to happen. The airplane I was flying today had the performance to reach altitude and turn safely before crossing 23L. However depending on the atmospheric conditions; the type of airplane and its weight we will not always be able to turn prior to the runway without increasing the risk of a stall/spin accident to an unacceptable level. This may lead to additional hazards and possibly a near collision with an aircraft taking off or landing on the perpendicular runways.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.