37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1606523 |
Time | |
Date | 201812 |
Local Time Of Day | 1801-2400 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | PDX.Airport |
State Reference | OR |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | B737 Undifferentiated or Other Model |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 121 |
Flight Phase | Taxi |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Aircraft 2 | |
Make Model Name | PA-34 Seneca Undifferentiated |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Landing |
Route In Use | None |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Local |
Qualification | Air Traffic Control Developmental |
Events | |
Anomaly | ATC Issue All Types Conflict Ground Conflict Critical Deviation - Procedural Clearance Ground Incursion Runway |
Narrative:
I taxied aircraft X to runway 10L full length with a clearance to cross runway 21 on kilo. At the time of this instruction; I had control of runway 3/21. There were no conflicts along the taxi route so I passed the strip. Aircraft Y had cancelled IFR and the local 1 controller made the decision to bring aircraft Y to runway 03. This was based on ragged fog at the approach end of runways 10 left and right as well as the southwest. The LC1 controller then asked for control of runway 3. I scanned my strip bay and the runway and seeing no traffic; I gave control of runway 3 to the LC1 controller. I did not realize aircraft X had not yet crossed and reached the approach end of 10L. The clearance delivery controller recognized that aircraft X was in the process of crossing runway 21 at kilo as aircraft Y was on short final. He recognized the conflict and advised the LC1 controller. The LC1 controller issued go around instructions to the LC1 controller. When I heard the LC1 controller issue go around instructions I scanned the runway and adjacent taxiways for conflicts. My thought was an aircraft in the vicinity of echo and foxtrot had mis-executed my instructions. I did not see aircraft X and recognize the conflict. Additionally; before regaining control of runway 3/21; I issued taxi instructions to aircraft Z via kilo with the clearance to cross 21. I take full and complete responsibility for this incident. It was my responsibility to ensure that no conflicts existed prior to transferring control of runway 3/21. Additionally; it was my responsibility to protect the runway when I do not have control of it. I did not execute those responsibilities. I expect to be held accountable as I would expect anyone in this organization to be held accountable for mediocre; sub-standard; unsafe performance. I am completely supportive of any and all remedial training opportunities to include classroom training; skill enhancement training and decertification. I do not want to be a minimally competent controller. I welcome the chance to get better. After discussions with senior experienced controllers about their techniques in this type of situation; I am not going to give up control of my runway until visually verifying that all aircraft in the receiving controllers bin are accounted for prior to releasing the runway. I am open to all constructive comments and ideas to be better. I am available for any clarifying questions.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: Portland Tower Controller reported a ground conflict and runway incursion were managed by issuance of go-around instructions.
Narrative: I taxied Aircraft X to Runway 10L full length with a clearance to cross Runway 21 on Kilo. At the time of this instruction; I had control of Runway 3/21. There were no conflicts along the taxi route so I passed the strip. Aircraft Y had cancelled IFR and the Local 1 Controller made the decision to bring Aircraft Y to Runway 03. This was based on ragged fog at the approach end of Runways 10 left and right as well as the southwest. The LC1 Controller then asked for control of Runway 3. I scanned my strip bay and the runway and seeing no traffic; I gave control of Runway 3 to the LC1 controller. I did not realize Aircraft X had not yet crossed and reached the approach end of 10L. The Clearance Delivery Controller recognized that Aircraft X was in the process of crossing Runway 21 at Kilo as Aircraft Y was on short final. He recognized the conflict and advised the LC1 Controller. The LC1 Controller issued go around instructions to the LC1 Controller. When I heard the LC1 Controller issue go around instructions I scanned the runway and adjacent taxiways for conflicts. My thought was an aircraft in the vicinity of Echo and Foxtrot had mis-executed my instructions. I did not see Aircraft X and recognize the conflict. Additionally; before regaining control of Runway 3/21; I issued taxi instructions to Aircraft Z via Kilo with the clearance to cross 21. I take full and complete responsibility for this incident. It was my responsibility to ensure that no conflicts existed prior to transferring control of Runway 3/21. Additionally; it was my responsibility to protect the runway when I do not have control of it. I did not execute those responsibilities. I expect to be held accountable as I would expect anyone in this organization to be held accountable for mediocre; sub-standard; unsafe performance. I am completely supportive of any and all remedial training opportunities to include classroom training; skill enhancement training and decertification. I do not want to be a minimally competent controller. I welcome the chance to get better. After discussions with senior experienced controllers about their techniques in this type of situation; I am not going to give up control of my runway until visually verifying that all aircraft in the receiving controllers bin are accounted for prior to releasing the runway. I am open to all constructive comments and ideas to be better. I am available for any clarifying questions.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.