37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 1678344 |
Time | |
Date | 201908 |
Local Time Of Day | 0001-0600 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | ZZZ.Airport |
State Reference | US |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | Marginal |
Light | Dawn |
Aircraft 1 | |
Make Model Name | Citation II S2/Bravo (C550) |
Operating Under FAR Part | Part 91 |
Flight Phase | Takeoff |
Route In Use | Vectors |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Function | Pilot Flying Single Pilot |
Qualification | Flight Crew Commercial Flight Crew Flight Instructor Flight Crew Multiengine Flight Crew Instrument |
Experience | Flight Crew Last 90 Days 125 Flight Crew Total 5300 Flight Crew Type 1000 |
Events | |
Anomaly | Aircraft Equipment Problem Less Severe Deviation - Procedural FAR Deviation - Procedural Published Material / Policy |
Narrative:
We experienced a depressurization at FL400. I [requested priority handling with ATC] followed by a descent to below 10;000 feet. We then landed at ZZZ. Inspection of the airplane did not reveal any structural damage. This was discussed with the co-owner of the plane who is also a mechanic and pilot with over 30;000 hours. He suggested that I fly the airplane back home unpressurized as allowed by the MEL. I agreed with him and filed a flight plan for 8;000 feet for the [next] morning. After uneventful preflight and startup we taxied to the runway. During takeoff at 90 knots IAS the airplane swerved to the left and vibrated due to a left main tire blowout. I was able to abort the takeoff and taxi the plane to the ramp. In my opinion these 2 events were not related. My concern after talking to the owner/mechanic again is that the MEL for unpressurized flight may not have been valid since the airplane was recently purchased. The MEL was resubmitted after purchase; but may still be in process with the FAA. For this reason it is possible that I unintentionally violated a regulation.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: C550 pilot reported a loss of cabin pressure resulting in a diversion; subsequently departing back to home airport; possibly with an incorrect MEL.
Narrative: We experienced a depressurization at FL400. I [requested priority handling with ATC] followed by a descent to below 10;000 feet. We then landed at ZZZ. Inspection of the airplane did not reveal any structural damage. This was discussed with the co-owner of the plane who is also a Mechanic and pilot with over 30;000 hours. He suggested that I fly the airplane back home unpressurized as allowed by the MEL. I agreed with him and filed a flight plan for 8;000 feet for the [next] morning. After uneventful preflight and startup we taxied to the runway. During takeoff at 90 knots IAS the airplane swerved to the left and vibrated due to a left main tire blowout. I was able to abort the takeoff and taxi the plane to the ramp. In my opinion these 2 events were not related. My concern after talking to the owner/mechanic again is that the MEL for unpressurized flight may not have been valid since the airplane was recently purchased. The MEL was resubmitted after purchase; but may still be in process with the FAA. For this reason it is possible that I unintentionally violated a regulation.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.