Narrative:

I was captain on the ZZZ - ZZZ1 flight. When I looked at the release; I saw there were a lot of mels and restrictions that pertained to inoperative automation. I also saw that we had a standardization check on this airplane. Typing the root cause MEL number into the search feature of the MEL manual; I immediately went over the mels with the first officer (first officer) to get a picture of what we were up against. There were several mels as the result of 22-xx-xx-X guidance panel MEL. I briefed alternate procedures as per the MEL and also determined the weather in ZZZ1 was good. As there was a higher altitude than standard for activating and disconnecting the autopilot; the approach had to be flown with the autopilot off as per MEL.the aircraft was late being towed up to the gate; which put us under time pressure. When I got into the flight deck; I noticed ap fail and at fail EICAS messages; which concerned me and prompted me to call maintenance. I started off by saying [that] I had read the mels and understood them; but I wanted to know what was going on with the ap fail and the at fail messages and if they and the other EICAS messages were associated with the mels. Maintenance said inoperative items were a result of the guidance panel MEL. I was assured the aircraft was fine; but insisted again that I wanted to make sure that the autopilot and autothrottle would function in flight. Maintenance read the MEL and said it was clear as mud and the aircraft was fine- it had been flying around for 8 days in this condition.during all of this; the first officer said his buttons were not functioning; to which I responded; well we found the non-operative side; I guess it's my leg. At that point; I moved on to solving the other problem; which was our missing check airman; and getting the flight off the gate as soon as possible. I was informed the check airman's schedule had been changed and we pushed back and flew to ZZZ1. When I got to the hotel in ZZZ1; I asked a friend for guidance. He said that one of the EICAS messages; afcs panel fail; was a no dispatch item; and the airplane had been incorrectly MEL'd. He said maintenance had MEL'd the airplane for an afcs fault instead.

Related reports:

Google
 

Original NASA ASRS Text

Title: EMB-175 Captain reported a misapplication of an MEL which resulted in the aircraft flying in a non airworthy condition.

Narrative: I was Captain on the ZZZ - ZZZ1 flight. When I looked at the release; I saw there were a lot of MELs and restrictions that pertained to inoperative automation. I also saw that we had a standardization check on this airplane. Typing the root cause MEL number into the search feature of the MEL manual; I immediately went over the MELs with the FO (First Officer) to get a picture of what we were up against. There were several MELs as the result of 22-XX-XX-X Guidance Panel MEL. I briefed alternate procedures as per the MEL and also determined the weather in ZZZ1 was good. As there was a higher altitude than standard for activating and disconnecting the autopilot; the approach had to be flown with the autopilot off as per MEL.The aircraft was late being towed up to the gate; which put us under time pressure. When I got into the flight deck; I noticed AP FAIL and AT FAIL EICAS messages; which concerned me and prompted me to call Maintenance. I started off by saying [that] I had read the MELs and understood them; but I wanted to know what was going on with the AP FAIL and the AT FAIL messages and if they and the other EICAS messages were associated with the MELs. Maintenance said inoperative items were a result of the Guidance Panel MEL. I was assured the aircraft was fine; but insisted again that I wanted to make sure that the autopilot and autothrottle would function in flight. Maintenance read the MEL and said it was clear as mud and the aircraft was fine- it had been flying around for 8 days in this condition.During all of this; the FO said his buttons were not functioning; to which I responded; well we found the non-operative side; I guess it's my leg. At that point; I moved on to solving the other problem; which was our missing Check Airman; and getting the flight off the gate as soon as possible. I was informed the Check Airman's schedule had been changed and we pushed back and flew to ZZZ1. When I got to the hotel in ZZZ1; I asked a friend for guidance. He said that one of the EICAS messages; AFCS PANEL FAIL; was a no dispatch item; and the airplane had been incorrectly MEL'd. He said Maintenance had MEL'd the airplane for an AFCS FAULT instead.

Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.