37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 172338 |
Time | |
Date | 199103 |
Day | Mon |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | airport : cle |
State Reference | OH |
Altitude | agl bound lower : 0 agl bound upper : 0 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Operator | common carrier : air carrier |
Make Model Name | Medium Transport, Low Wing, 2 Turboprop Eng |
Flight Phase | climbout : takeoff other |
Flight Plan | IFR |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : captain oversight : pic |
Qualification | pilot : atp |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 170 flight time total : 2400 |
ASRS Report | 172338 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | company : air carrier |
Function | flight crew : first officer |
Qualification | pilot : instrument pilot : commercial |
Events | |
Anomaly | other anomaly |
Independent Detector | other flight crewa |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : rejected takeoff |
Consequence | Other |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Airport |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Situations | |
Airport | other physical facility |
Narrative:
Upon beginning the takeoff roll on runway 28 at cle, we experienced some hydroplaning and partial loss of directional control at about 80 KIAS. The captain was flying and aborted the takeoff. V1 wa 107 KTS for our aircraft weight. The abort was accomplished smoothly with the aircraft on the runway's centerline at all times. During our taxi to the runway, ground control was reporting the runway was being, 'light covering of loose snow over a base of thin snow and ice.' braking action was reported 'poor,' with the wind 320 degrees at 4 KTS. It seems to me that had the runway been better cleared by ground personnel, or had the ground controller obtained and relayed to us a more current and accurate runway condition report, we would not have been in the position to have to abort. The runway visually appeared to match the controller's description as we sat in position waiting for takeoff clearance. Only after beginning the takeoff roll did we realize a problem.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: COMMUTER MDT TKOF ABORT DUE TO PARTIAL LOSS OF ACFT CTL AT 80 KTS.
Narrative: UPON BEGINNING THE TKOF ROLL ON RWY 28 AT CLE, WE EXPERIENCED SOME HYDROPLANING AND PARTIAL LOSS OF DIRECTIONAL CTL AT ABOUT 80 KIAS. THE CAPT WAS FLYING AND ABORTED THE TKOF. V1 WA 107 KTS FOR OUR ACFT WT. THE ABORT WAS ACCOMPLISHED SMOOTHLY WITH THE ACFT ON THE RWY'S CENTERLINE AT ALL TIMES. DURING OUR TAXI TO THE RWY, GND CTL WAS RPTING THE RWY WAS BEING, 'LIGHT COVERING OF LOOSE SNOW OVER A BASE OF THIN SNOW AND ICE.' BRAKING ACTION WAS RPTED 'POOR,' WITH THE WIND 320 DEGS AT 4 KTS. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT HAD THE RWY BEEN BETTER CLRED BY GND PERSONNEL, OR HAD THE GND CTLR OBTAINED AND RELAYED TO US A MORE CURRENT AND ACCURATE RWY CONDITION RPT, WE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN IN THE POS TO HAVE TO ABORT. THE RWY VISUALLY APPEARED TO MATCH THE CTLR'S DESCRIPTION AS WE SAT IN POS WAITING FOR TKOF CLRNC. ONLY AFTER BEGINNING THE TKOF ROLL DID WE REALIZE A PROB.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.