37000 Feet | Browse and search NASA's Aviation Safety Reporting System |
|
Attributes | |
ACN | 200323 |
Time | |
Date | 199201 |
Day | Fri |
Local Time Of Day | 0601 To 1200 |
Place | |
Locale Reference | atc facility : npa airport : nps |
State Reference | HI |
Altitude | msl bound lower : 500 msl bound upper : 500 |
Environment | |
Flight Conditions | VMC |
Light | Daylight |
Aircraft 1 | |
Controlling Facilities | artcc : zhn |
Operator | general aviation : instructional |
Make Model Name | Small Aircraft, High Wing, 1 Eng, Fixed Gear |
Flight Phase | descent : approach |
Flight Plan | None |
Person 1 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | instruction : instructor |
Qualification | pilot : cfi pilot : commercial pilot : instrument |
Experience | flight time last 90 days : 100 flight time total : 1200 flight time type : 450 |
ASRS Report | 200323 |
Person 2 | |
Affiliation | Other |
Function | observation : observer |
Qualification | other other : other |
Events | |
Anomaly | inflight encounter other other anomaly other |
Independent Detector | other other : unspecified cockpit |
Resolutory Action | flight crew : took evasive action |
Consequence | faa : investigated |
Miss Distance | horizontal : 200 vertical : 500 |
Supplementary | |
Primary Problem | Flight Crew Human Performance |
Air Traffic Incident | other |
Narrative:
While entering the traffic pattern I did not have my traffic in sight. I then proceeded to turn base, at that point I had my traffic in sight and had to extend my downwind to ensure proper spacing. Unknowingly, I turned my base leg over a loading dock (military). I feel that if the military does not want aircraft possibly flying over that area when necessary, they should make pilots aware of their loading dock and request pilots stay clear. I was unaware of this loading dock, and will stay clear next time. Callback conversation with reporter revealed the following information. Reporter states when he found it necessary to turn back to downwind he had started a descent and probably the low altitude was the problem. The FAA contacted him within 20 mins. He explained what happened. Told no further action. 3 weeks later received call asking for explanation. That's when he filed report. In response to question reference official business as referenced in AFD, stated that airport receives state funding so has opened airport to touch and go civilian traffic.
Original NASA ASRS Text
Title: TRAINING FLT TURNS BASE, SIGHTS TFC RETURNS TO DOWNWIND. DSCNT ON BASE TURN CAUSES LOW FLT OVER MIL DOCK.
Narrative: WHILE ENTERING THE TFC PATTERN I DID NOT HAVE MY TFC IN SIGHT. I THEN PROCEEDED TO TURN BASE, AT THAT POINT I HAD MY TFC IN SIGHT AND HAD TO EXTEND MY DOWNWIND TO ENSURE PROPER SPACING. UNKNOWINGLY, I TURNED MY BASE LEG OVER A LOADING DOCK (MIL). I FEEL THAT IF THE MIL DOES NOT WANT ACFT POSSIBLY FLYING OVER THAT AREA WHEN NECESSARY, THEY SHOULD MAKE PLTS AWARE OF THEIR LOADING DOCK AND REQUEST PLTS STAY CLR. I WAS UNAWARE OF THIS LOADING DOCK, AND WILL STAY CLR NEXT TIME. CALLBACK CONVERSATION WITH RPTR REVEALED THE FOLLOWING INFO. RPTR STATES WHEN HE FOUND IT NECESSARY TO TURN BACK TO DOWNWIND HE HAD STARTED A DSCNT AND PROBABLY THE LOW ALT WAS THE PROBLEM. THE FAA CONTACTED HIM WITHIN 20 MINS. HE EXPLAINED WHAT HAPPENED. TOLD NO FURTHER ACTION. 3 WKS LATER RECEIVED CALL ASKING FOR EXPLANATION. THAT'S WHEN HE FILED RPT. IN RESPONSE TO QUESTION REF OFFICIAL BUSINESS AS REFERENCED IN AFD, STATED THAT ARPT RECEIVES STATE FUNDING SO HAS OPENED ARPT TO TOUCH AND GO CIVILIAN TFC.
Data retrieved from NASA's ASRS site as of July 2007 and automatically converted to unabbreviated mixed upper/lowercase text. This report is for informational purposes with no guarantee of accuracy. See NASA's ASRS site for official report.